Bob Stayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How long is too long?
27 characters.
I think a warning might be ok, but automatically shortening IDs is a
dangerous thing. Truncation may not be sufficient if two IDs
truncate to the same string. Also, you might need to have stable
URLs that can be
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:52:22PM +0100, Tobias Reif wrote:
Marko Petersen wrote:
How could I make every title font-weight=100, best with one line?
I don't know how to do this in one line, but there are attribute sets
you can
customize. Take a look at
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:16:17PM +0100, Tobias Reif wrote:
Hi
Let's say I want to change all sect1 titles. I grab my
titlepage.templates.xml copy (1.60.1), then insert
font-weight=100
into
t:titlepage t:element=sect1 t:wrapper=fo:block
t:titlepage-content t:side=recto
Hi
Bob Stayton wrote:
Norm might want to answer this too, but
I believe the mechanisms are meant to be combined, in
a hierarchical manner. The titlepage.templates
mechanism establishes the default values, and the
propery attribute-sets provide the runtime flexibility.
But some stuff can
what XSL param would i use to generate a single-level
TOC in every section, regardless of that section's level?
that is, at the chapter level, i want to open with a TOC that
contains only the section level 1 entries.
if i go to a level 1 section, it should start with a TOC
listing its
Camille Bégnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I report a bug or is this behavior intended? Is there a
parameter that may change that?
This testcase shows another minor issue: the page pointed at in the
TOC for the parts is the page of the following chapter, not the part
title page.
File
Folks here who use DSSSL (seems to be a distinct minority!) might be
interested in some of the recent work I've done in the DSSSL
stylesheets.
If anyone is interested in helping me fix some outstanding DSSSL
issues, or testing to ensure I haven't broken anything; please getthe
CVS modules from
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
what XSL param would i use to generate a single-level
TOC in every section, regardless of that section's level?
Lucky boy! By a coincidence a added new parameter for exactly this into
stylesheets on a Friday. If you want to use it, grab file
xsl/html/autotoc.xsl from
Bob,
Thanks for your mail. Unfortunately, this customization seems to open up
a can of worms. Processing my sdocbook file via the xhtml stylesheets
using Instant Saxon, there are the comparative results: no customization
versus customized
Before:
div class=abstract
p
It looks as if the css.decoration parameter tries to control the
type=disc attribute output with UL. However, the test doesn't seem to
have any effect; flipping the value between 1 and 0 makes no difference.
I've checked for single/double quoting issues pretty throughly.
In fact, if I copy the
How can I tell frames.xsl (slides 3.1) where I have my css style sheets? Html
output pages always look for them at
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/slides/browser/slides.css
I haven't had no problem with 3.0
My slides-custom-frames.xsl
xsl:stylesheet
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:52:00PM -0500, ed nixon wrote:
It looks as if the css.decoration parameter tries to control the
type=disc attribute output with UL. However, the test doesn't seem to
have any effect; flipping the value between 1 and 0 makes no difference.
I've checked for
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:18:45PM -0500, ed nixon wrote:
Bob,
Thanks for your mail. Unfortunately, this customization seems to open up
a can of worms. Processing my sdocbook file via the xhtml stylesheets
using Instant Saxon, there are the comparative results: no customization
versus
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 11:14:09AM +0100, Tobias Reif wrote:
Hi
Bob Stayton wrote:
Norm might want to answer this too, but
I believe the mechanisms are meant to be combined, in
a hierarchical manner. The titlepage.templates
mechanism establishes the default values, and the
propery
14 matches
Mail list logo
