"Kevin Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like a stylesheet issue, though I have no idea at what
> point in the chain it could be fixed. The dsl stylesheet writes the
> ascii code for the degree symbol into the tex file. TeX understands
> the symbol and prints it, but stupidly, with too
>Kevin Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have an almost insignificant problem that I have had little
>> success in understanding--the degree symbol in my generated pdf has
>> extra whitespace at the end. I have looked in the .tex output from
>> openjade and jadetex and there is no extra whit
-- Original Message --
From: Adam DiCarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 03:14:53 -0600
>Kevin Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The problem is that the page numbers are occasionally wrong when a
>> floating figure or equation is bumped to t
Apparently I need to pay more attention to the latest versions of the DTD.
;) (I really need to upgrade ours some day -- still using 3.something.)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Stayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Jeff Beal
Cc: 'Claus Rasmussen'; [EMAI
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:11:39AM -0500, Jeff Beal wrote:
> Oh. In that case, I think you can quite legitimately point fingers at both
> DocBook and FOP. I just checked FOP's website, and they do not suppor the
> formatting object. However, there's also nothing in the DocBook
> DTD or in Norm'
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:45:14 +0100
Stefan Bylund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Damian,
>
> I first tried xincluder but I soon found out that xmllint is
> more fully featured. I use the following command to resolve all
> xincludes before invoking the XSLT processor (Saxon):
>
> xmllint --xinclu
At 13:50 14/03/2003 +0100, Gour wrote:
Jirka Kosek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From theoretical point of view RNG is cool schema language especially
> for grammar-based document types like DocBook. AFAIK there is zero
> support for RNG in XML content creation tools (editors). And you will
> have
Oh. In that case, I think you can quite legitimately point fingers at both
DocBook and FOP. I just checked FOP's website, and they do not suppor the
formatting object. However, there's also nothing in the DocBook
DTD or in Norm's stylesheets to output an . It certainly seems
that with your par
Jeff,
Thanks for your snappy reply.
I should have been clearer in my question - I actually meant, whether
such behavior is supported by the docbook xsl style sheets for fo,
because that's where I can't get it to work.
I'm using FOP - is that the sinner here, or is it not supported at the
style
You'll need to place the image inside of a element.
-Original Message-
From: Claus Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Wrap text around images in PDFs, using xsl:fo
Is subj. possible at all? I can create i
Which XSLT processor are you using?
Which FO formatter are you using?
The adjustColumnWidths function is an extension function Norm wrote. It is
not implemented in XSL, but relies on different processor-specific
mechanisms. If you're using Saxon, for example, you need to include
docbook-xsl-1.60
Is subj. possible at all? I can create inline graphics, but only that
one line of text will wrap around it. I'm looking for a look like what
happens in HTML when you align an image to the left or to the right, and
the surrounding text wraps around it, like:
+-+
| | blah, blah, text
Jirka Kosek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From theoretical point of view RNG is cool schema language especially
> for grammar-based document types like DocBook. AFAIK there is zero
> support for RNG in XML content creation tools (editors). And you will
> have same problem with entities as in XML sc
Gour wrote:
> > Be you, I would stay with DTD for DocBook documents.
>
> And what about Relax NG?
>From theoretical point of view RNG is cool schema language especially
for grammar-based document types like DocBook. AFAIK there is zero
support for RNG in XML content creation tools (editors). An
Hello,
When I have this option turned on in my docbook customization layer:
tables don't appear in the XSLFO file and I read:
"No adjustColumnWidths function available."
When I turn extensions off, they're back!
What's the problem?
Greetings,
Jeroen Alblas
* [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* + 3
Jirka Kosek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Be you, I would stay with DTD for DocBook documents.
And what about Relax NG?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #278493
"Olson, Dave -Systems" wrote:
>
> Could someone give me a list of the advantages and disadvantages of using
> the DocBook DTD(s) vs. a DocBook XML Schema? I'm just starting a
DocBook DTD is more mature and proven technology. I think that XML
schema for DocBook is just early release for testing.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote:
> > Steinar Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [snip! DocBook XSL stylesheets and XML Catalogs on RedHat 8.0]
>
> > Presumably this caused the docbook-style-xsl to tidy up after
> > itself, when being removed? And my RPM doesn't put an
On Sex, 2003-03-14 at 00:25, Bob Stayton wrote:
> It works for me, using your command and options.
> I don't know why it doesn't work for you.
> I'm using Jimi as well.
Good Morning
That's odd. Have you changed in anyway the configuration file for FOP?
If not, then I will have to live without
> Steinar Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip! DocBook XSL stylesheets and XML Catalogs on RedHat 8.0]
> Presumably this caused the docbook-style-xsl to tidy up after
> itself, when being removed? And my RPM doesn't put anything in
> (yet).
I took at look at the spec file from the docbook-style
20 matches
Mail list logo
