AW: AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: AW: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook

2003-03-15 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
hummm ok that (jdk 1.3) could be a solution. i was using jdk 1.4.1 :( > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: Markus Spath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Marz 2003 23:19 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: AW: Re: Problems wit

Re: AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: AW: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook

2003-03-15 Thread Markus Spath
Daniel S. Haischt wrote: the xslt task got a classpath/classpathref attribute which i used. i can try it again but i had the feeling it wasn't my fault, tho. maybe someone other has any ideas about this issue ... many XML related problems seem to disappear when switching back to java 1.3. styling

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function

2003-03-15 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > Since import precedence is the primary discriminator for template > matching, I think the test above should match comment and processing > instruction nodes. > > So I think it's an xsltproc bug that they don't. Which has been fixed i

AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: AW: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook

2003-03-15 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
the xslt task got a classpath/classpathref attribute which i used. i can try it again but i had the feeling it wasn't my fault, tho. maybe someone other has any ideas about this issue ... regards daniel s. haischt -- > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: Norman Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function

2003-03-15 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Norman Walsh wrote: > So I think it's an xsltproc bug that they don't. yup, i submitted a bugzilla for xsltproc about that already. my final understanding is that "node()", being short for "child::node()", should match all of (and only) 1) elements 2) text nodes 3) comments

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: AW: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / "Daniel S. Haischt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | the ant style/xslt task did not work out for me too, because the task | did not used the explicitely specified classpath - or at least i | had the feeling that the classpath wont be used. T

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: empty tags in html transformation

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Frédéric Glorieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Instead of xhtml transformations, I prefer use common html with | an xml output, and no namespace declaration. OK, it's not correct, but | works quite correctly under NS4 _and_ IE; and

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Posts not being delivered...

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Patrick Eisenacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | ...looks like you still have some problems, Bob :o( | | It seems, it took your mail almost a whole day to reach its | destination. I got it here at 7pm Sat 8 March (GMT+01), so that should |

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Bob Stayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:01:32PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: |> |> "XSLT", Doug Tidwell, p. 51 |> |> "* The node() node test, which selects all nodes in the current |> context, regardless

AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook

2003-03-15 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
hello, > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: Norman Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Marz 2003 21:22 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: access key customization for TOC entries

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / ed nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I'm just starting to think about a customization to sdbk to html that | would put an accesskey attribute pair into the toc entries generated | by the xsl stylesheets. Admittedly, I haven't studied the

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: MLA, APA and annotated bibliographies

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Carlos Araya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I am trying to get citations for a MLA bibliography I am working on and have | the following problem: The recomended MLA format for an online resource is: | | Bruckman, Amy (1992). "Identity Worksh

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: XML support in Word 2002

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / "Boos, Paul M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I have not had the brief myself - but my customer was briefed and indicated | it is true; however, they are not using a standard schema under the covers - | but their own (meaning you can't go t

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: [Stylesheets] Adding a text the *first* timeyouencounter a given element?

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | It works and it is elegant and simple. Thanks. I just have to find a | similar construct in DSSSL (which does not have Xpath). There is one, though it doesn't occur to me anymore off the to

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: use.id.as.filename may produce invalid filenames

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Gisbert Amm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | 2) Wouldn't it be reasonable to provide a parameter to avoid any special | characters in the generated filenames? No. Well, I suppose they could be %-encoded or something, but I think it makes more

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Problems with ANT and DocBook

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Marc Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | The first file (platform-arch.xml) builds to HTML fine usind DocBook | XSL, but the second file dies straight away. Sure looks like an ant bug to me. | This implies that something is not being "re

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: XHTML Strict

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | So with that long preamble, I'd like to ask what the state of xhtml strict | is? Strict is a requirement of this project, and if it's not available in | DocBook I'd certainly consider putting in the effort requir

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Slides + css problem

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / luis miguel morillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | How can I tell frames.xsl (slides 3.1) where I have my css style sheets? Html | output pages always look for them at | http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/slides/browser/slides.css | I

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Docbook and FOP

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Corey Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I am trying to convert my XML document to PDF using FOP. I first | generate a .fo file using the Saxon XSLT engine using the default | parser. Then I am using FOP to convert the .fo file to a .pd

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: gentext customization: remove "Abstract" and"Table of Contents" in HTML

2003-03-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / ed nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Before: | | Abstract | Some document projects successfully completed ... | Now, the challenge is to integrate... | | | After: | http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"; class="abstract"> |

DOCBOOK-APPS: empty tags in html transformation

2003-03-15 Thread Frédéric Glorieux
Hello, Instead of xhtml transformations, I prefer use common html with an xml output, and no namespace declaration. OK, it's not correct, but works quite correctly under NS4 _and_ IE; and very useful for later pipes. The only big problem is empty tags. For example,

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: writing a condensed form of docbook

2003-03-15 Thread Karl Eichwalder
Markus Spath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> i like to write my documents and manuals in condensed >> form, and it would be nice to quickly to go from that to final docbook. >> > > Since you stay with the xml-syntax anyway This sounds like a arguable requirement... If