On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Mads Ipsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | If I do something like:
> |
> |
> |
> | Water molecule constructed with Molecular Builder. The
> | molecule was obtained simply by hovering the mouse over
> | the c
The start-indent="$body.start.indent" property is applied to the fo:flow
within each page-sequence. In is an inherited property, so every block in
the flow inherits it. In the case of the chapter and section titles, there
is a local attribute setting that counteracts it. You can change that b
/ Mads Ipsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| If I do something like:
|
|
|
| Water molecule constructed with Molecular Builder. The
| molecule was obtained simply by hovering the mouse over
| the carbon atom in the &methane; molecule shown in
| a
/ "Bill Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| - Default fonts
| This would be the actual definition in a template, not the inclusion of the
| font files themselves in the tools.
|
| While Unicode fonts, can contain all characters, some (perhaps most?) do
| not, and sometimes a Unicode font
Hi,
If I do something like:
Water molecule constructed with Molecular Builder. The
molecule was obtained simply by hovering the mouse over
the carbon atom in the &methane; molecule shown in
and pressing the
O key.
...
then th
Bob Stayton wrote:
> This is a known problem in the DocBook table processing templates. CALS
> tables are processed by recursing on rows in order to calculate row spans,
> which can start at any point in a table. In Saxon, the recursion depth
> seems to be about 600, so your table goes beyond th
/ Jacques Foucry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Hello,
|
| I tried today to add some "see also" statement in glossary entry, with
| DocBook 5.0 (latest snapshot).
|
| I've done something like that :
|
|
| SVN
|
|
|Blah blah blah
|
Hi Jacques,
On Dienstag, 20. März 2007, Jacques Foucry wrote:
>
> I tried today to add some "see also" statement in glossary entry,
> with DocBook 5.0 (latest snapshot).
>
> I've done something like that :
>
>
> SVN
>
>
> Blah blah blah
>
Hello,
I tried today to add some "see also" statement in glossary entry,
with DocBook 5.0 (latest snapshot).
I've done something like that :
SVN
Blah blah blah
I made the same as or a .
But nothing app
Hi Bill,
I am maintaining a project called DocDook sml
(http:/docbooksml.sourceforge.net/).
sml stands for singlesource multi-language. DocBook sml provides an easy
and secure way to maintain multilingual documentations. The core idea of
DocBook sml is keeping/assembling all documentation conten
Greetings.
I posted this request yesterday on xsl-list, but Jirka Kosek pointed me here
instead.
I'm doing a presentation on various schemas at WritersUA next week, and one
topic I want to address is the internationalization support built into
various open-source tools. I know DocBook XSL has so
Hi Paul,
On Dienstag, 20. März 2007, Paul Moloney wrote:
> [...]
>
> To make these easier to handle, I tried setting a common attribute set
> - for example, heading1.style - and assigning it to multiple sets as
> follows:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
^^^
> How
About 5 minutes after posting, I discovered what I was doing wrong - sorry.
To answer my own question, I should have used, for example:
http://www.nabble.com/Handling-Similar-Attribute-Sets-tf3434472.html#a9575383
Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 19.03.2007, 18:41 -0500 schrieb Paul DuBois:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hi,
If I use e.g.
\fB
\fR
in the customization layer for a manpage XSLT stylesheet, I get an
output of:
\efB...\efR
I'm wondering, what is so different to using
which res
In our customization layer, we have multiple attribute sets which are
identical; for example, glossary titles, appendix titles and chapter titles
are the same.
To make these easier to handle, I tried setting a common attribute set - for
example, heading1.style - and assigning it to multiple se
Title: Re: [docbook-apps] Tabular presentation of
segmented lists
Thanks Bob. I'd never used a segmented list before, so
thought I'd give it a try. I tested both a variable list and a
table and found the table best.
Ron
Hi
Ron,
If it is two
columns, you might consider using a variablelist inst
16 matches
Mail list logo
