Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread Frank Arensmeier
10 dec 2013 kl. 07:59 skrev davep da...@dpawson.co.uk: On 09/12/13 16:09, Norman Walsh wrote: I can see you getting 80% with html and CSS... My penneth says you'll fall over on the 20% so I'm -1 on this. Do you believe you can do it? What of re-ordering, toc etc? Oh, you'd need a for

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread davep
On 10/12/13 09:41, Frank Arensmeier wrote: 10 dec 2013 kl. 07:59 skrev davep da...@dpawson.co.uk: On 09/12/13 16:09, Norman Walsh wrote: I can see you getting 80% with html and CSS... My penneth says you'll fall over on the 20% so I'm -1 on this. Do you believe you can do it? What of

[docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread Norman Walsh
Jan Tosovsky j.tosov...@email.cz writes: On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote: ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned. Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any citation for this? http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/ This WOrking (sic) Group is no longer

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread Peter Desjardins
I think you mentioned exploring HTML+CSS for print a few days ago. Is that because FO might be at the end of it's road? Thanks! Peter On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Norman Walsh n...@nwalsh.com wrote: Jan Tosovsky j.tosov...@email.cz writes: On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote: ... future

Re: [docbook-apps] HTML5 Audio + Video multiple sources

2013-12-10 Thread Carlos Araya
Bob, wouldn't this be similar to the markup you implemented for the ePub3 Stylesheet solution that you worked on? If I remember correctly that was built on top of the HTML5 stylesheets, correct? On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Bob Stayton b...@sagehill.net wrote: Hi Peter, This is not yet