I'm not completely clear on what you need here, but there are processing
instructions that can be used to specify a table row height. The HTML
version is described here:
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/RowHeight.html
And since that was written, an FO version was added as well:
...
On 27.1.2014 16:59, markus.sticker.e...@zf.com wrote:
> I have to do both (xhtml and pdf).
> Thank for your advice.
> Is that right:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-saxon/1.00/docbook-xsl-saxon-1.00.zip/download
> ???
No, I think it is this one:
https://lists.oasis-
I have to do both (xhtml and pdf).
Thank for your advice.
Is that right:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-saxon/1.00/docbook-xsl-saxon-1.00.zip/download
???
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jirka Kosek [mailto:ji...@kosek.cz]
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 16:
On 27.1.2014 16:42, markus.sticker.e...@zf.com wrote:
> I tried to use the 9.5EE but there was the problem with the chunker
> "Don't know how to chunk with Saxonica"
> Saxon uses xsl:result-document.
I thought that you are producing FO output, not chunked HTML. There is
patched version of chunker
Hi Jirka,
I tried to use the 9.5EE but there was the problem with the chunker
"Don't know how to chunk with Saxonica"
Saxon uses xsl:result-document.
So I changed to Saxon 8 - also docbook (kimber index method) retruns with
"use saxon 6 or 8" ... so that's the reason.
Best regards
Markus
On 27.1.2014 16:03, markus.sticker.e...@zf.com wrote:
> I found out that the autoindex ist very slow or contains high load.
> I tried to use the index.method kosek or kimber, but the kosek way
> didn't improve the speed and the kimber way didn't work with
> saxon 8.8.0.7.
Why you are not using S
Hi,
I found out that the autoindex ist very slow or contains high load.
I tried to use the index.method kosek or kimber, but the kosek way
didn't improve the speed and the kimber way didn't work with
saxon 8.8.0.7.
So ... is there a way to speed up the indexer?
Best regards
Markus
-Ursprü
