Dave Brooks wrote...
At 12:53 19/03/2002 +1100, Andrew Westcombe wrote:
At 05:00 PM 12/03/2002 -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
It also helps if the source is good HTML. Having closing tags such
as /li, /p, and /br helps immensely.
I've used DocParse myself, it's not bad, and very good
Thanks for the explanation here and in the
Why listitem is not parallel with (X)HTML li? thread.
The thing is clear to me now. This is another example of one
of the 5 attributes of complex systems as cited by
Grady Booch in his Object Oriented Design with Applications,
The Benjamin/Cummings
Hi Lars,
I am not going to explain what and why DocBook tools produce.
But for HTML 4.01, the LI element can contain block or inline
elements (zero or more). The P is the block element where the p tag
is required and the /p tag is optional. Thus, the following
ul
lipSome Paragraph/p/li
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:15 PM
To: docbook-apps
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: ListItem
Prikryl,Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... I guess that it depends on the browser if the two
cases
(This is related to doxygen and to its possible future
output into DocBook XML. The message appeared in
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but now it seems to be
more related to doxygen than to DocBook. Please, join
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to
participate on doxygen development, and to follow this
Hi DocBookers,
Daniel Veillard wrote...
[...] one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no direct
DocBook XML - TeX transformations. Basically they require
going through FO where the semantic is lost and only content/formatting
[...] Granted, LaTeX is not TeX, but isn't there more
Hi DocBookers,
Earlier, I was used to use bib files for storing bibliography entries
and BibTeX with some bib styles to produce the desired layout
of Bibliography. This is related to LaTeX.
Is there any equivalent of this when XML DocBook is used
instead of LaTeX? If yes, are ther any
Jirka Kosek wrote:
Kaiser Christian (SV SC RS T33) wrote:
I've got a poject in XML DocBook 5.0 which I'd transformed into
HTML with Xalan.
Now I want to use IE as XSLT engine.
Make sure that you upgraded MSXML to version 3 and run xmlinst.exe
utility. Without it IE doesn't know XSLT, just
Hi DocBookers,
Does anybody here use JED editor for DocBook XML sources?
The reason why I am asking is that JED emulates Emacs,
but it uses C-like internal language instead of e-lisp.
Recently DocBook support appeared in JED and I would like
to know how useful it is for you. I am using JED
Hi DocBookers,
After reinstalation of my computer, I would like to install
everything to use DocBook XML. I tried but did not find
a simple step-by-step description on how should I install
DocBook XML necessary files, the tools (what and how),
and how to set the environment in Windows NT.
(was "New to DocBook: XML or SGML, Clark or Open?" in DOCBOOK list)
Sorry for bothering you with greenhorn questions, but after
subscribing to DOCBOOK-APPS I think that the most experienced
DocBookers read DOCBOOK-APPS more frequently than DOCBOOK.
As I would like to absorb the SGML/XML/DocBook
11 matches
Mail list logo