Hi Peter,
Good question. Here are a few ideas:
* Add a "Log a bug" link to each page that links to your bug tracking
system. It's usually easy to add a few query parameters that prepopulate
the new bug with contextual information (url, version, component, build
date, etc). Then the users only
On 23.10.2018 18:53, Peter Desjardins wrote:
> Do you have a great DocBook-based review process?
oXygen Web Author
https://www.oxygenxml.com/xml_web_author.html
provides editing, revision tracking and commenting features running in
the browser. They have also git backend. Recently they have
On 26/10/2018 02:32, Peter Desjardins wrote:
Thank you, all! Your ideas are extremely helpful!
I've never used it, but you could look at Content Fusion from oXygen:
https://www.oxygenxml.com/content_fusion.html
Its byline is "Web collaboration solution for any XML documentation
review
Thank you, all! Your ideas are extremely helpful!
Peter
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:08 AM Camille Bégnis wrote:
>
> Hi Peter and all,
>
> We have developed a feature into Calenco (https://www.calenco.com) based
> on http://annotatorjs.org/ that allows anyone to comment on a Web
> version of the
Hi Peter and all,
We have developed a feature into Calenco (https://www.calenco.com) based
on http://annotatorjs.org/ that allows anyone to comment on a Web
version of the source file. Comments are stored server side.
Then the technical writer have access to the same page with a list of
all
https://web.hypothes.is/
AFAIK - meant to 'comment' on html (and could be used that way.)
Unsure if you want to mark up / comment on XML or some more 'user
friendly' version
of same?
Just a suggestion.
Dave
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 17:53, Peter Desjardins
wrote:
>
> Hi! Does anyone have a
Hi! Does anyone have a document content review process you can
recommend? One that allows non-DocBook users to easily provide input
and see each other's comments?
My team uses Google docs for content review because reviewers can
comment easily and see each other's input (this is at a company that
