Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-12 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Thank you for this and for your patience Bernhard Am 11.02.2019 um 23:14 schrieb Jirka Kosek: > On 11.2.2019 23:05, Bernhard Kleine wrote: >> unfortunately it works only for the preface. for the whole book I >> encountered the following error: >> >> Ambiguous rule match for

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-11 Thread Bernhard Kleine
unfortunately it works only for the preface. for the whole book I encountered the following error: Ambiguous rule match for /book[1]/part[3]/chapter[1]/para[3] Matches both "d:para[not(parent::d:footnote)]" on line 280 of

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-11 Thread Bernhard Kleine
works! Thanks a lot Bernhard Am 11.02.2019 um 16:32 schrieb Jirka Kosek: > On 11.2.2019 10:03, Bernhard Kleine wrote: >> I did as you advised. I found the offending template: >> >> > anpassen -\-> > This templates overrides the following template that injects footnote > marks into the footnote:

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-11 Thread Jirka Kosek
On 11.2.2019 10:03, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > I did as you advised. I found the offending template: > > anpassen -\-> This templates overrides the following template that injects footnote marks into the footnote: The easiest fix would be to

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-11 Thread Bernhard Kleine
I did as you advised. I found the offending template:                             0.15em     0.1em     .2em     12pt             As I cannot why this removes footnote marks, maybe you can explain it to me and please show how to

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-09 Thread Bob Stayton
When I run into a problem like this, I start commenting out templates in my customization until I find the one causing the problem, then examine that one in more detail.  If you find the culprit but cannot see why it is wrong, post it here. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises b...@sagehill.net

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
I did the same and got a footnote mark. Using the previous  oxygen configuration but not my customization file (attached) I got the footnote mark. I cannot see what it is in the customization that blocks footnote marks. Please help Regards Bernhard Am 08.02.2019 um 18:09 schrieb Bob Stayton: >

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-08 Thread Bob Stayton
Hi Bernhard, I just copied and pasted your example into my document and processed it with Oxygen's default docbook PDF transformation, and I see the footnote mark "a" in both the paragraph and before the footnote paragraph.  The stylesheet uses the same template to generate the mark, so I'm

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
 die Schmetterlinge     Die Begriffe Falter und Schmetterling sind meines Wissens gleichbedeutend und     werden in gleichem Sinne verwendet.     vor, Am 08.02.2019 um 17:11 schrieb Bob Stayton: > > That's odd.  My footnotes are numbered, not lettered.  How is

Re: [docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-08 Thread Bob Stayton
That's odd.  My footnotes are numbered, not lettered.  How is it that your footnotes are lettered?  Can you supply a sample of the markup you used? Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises b...@sagehill.net On 2/8/2019 4:49 AM, Bernhard Kleine wrote: In my book I noticed that footnote marks are

[docbook-apps] Footnote marks missing

2019-02-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
In my book I noticed that footnote marks are missing. I didnot change anything with respect to footnote marks in the configuration of oxygen or in the customization file. I use oxygen 20.1 and the inbuilt saxon 6.5 to produce a pdf. I need some advice to have footnote marks at the footnote: