On 5 June 2018 at 13:58, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 4.6.2018 17:14, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> AFAIK (speak up Jirka!) they have not been completely ported to XSLT 2.0
>> Most, but not all of the templates.
>
> Norm is one who wrote most of them, so you should ask him ;-)
>
> You should give it a try. Th
Hey Jirka,
Thanks. I only use DocBook to go to html5 (using latex for pdf instead of
fo). I'll give it a try.
If I get everything working for production documentation workflow, I'll
repost here.
thanks!
--Tim
'
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 4.6.2018 17:14, Dave Pawson
On 4.6.2018 17:14, Dave Pawson wrote:
> AFAIK (speak up Jirka!) they have not been completely ported to XSLT 2.0
> Most, but not all of the templates.
Norm is one who wrote most of them, so you should ask him ;-)
You should give it a try. There is no 1:1 correspondence between
available features
Thanks for that info Dave. I have to say I'm more of an XSLT user than a
programmer.
I guess I'll stick with 1.0 for now.
thanks,
--Tim
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> AFAIK (speak up Jirka!) they have not been completely ported to XSLT 2.0
> Most, but not all of the tem
AFAIK (speak up Jirka!) they have not been completely ported to XSLT 2.0
Most, but not all of the templates.
If you want to help???
regards
On 4 June 2018 at 14:54, Tim Arnold wrote:
> Hi again,
> Just checking to make sure--is nobody on the list using the XSLT2.0
> stylesheets in production y
Hi again,
Just checking to make sure--is nobody on the list using the XSLT2.0
stylesheets in production yet?
I'm pretty conservative when it comes to code changes and I don't want to
be on the bleeding edge!
thanks,
--Tim
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tim Arnold
Date: Fri, Jun
