honyk wrote:
> intended just for utilizing InDesign as a rendering engine. BTW up to know I
> don't understand why Adobe doesn't offer its own XSL-FO processor with all
> these typographical features implemented in it. Between these (most of them
Adobe has XSL-FO engine
http://www.adobe.com/prod
L for Technical Communicators
http://xmlpress.net
(970) 231-3624
> -Original Message-
> From: honyk [mailto:j.tosov...@email.cz]
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:52 PM
> To: 'Dick Hamilton'; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] RFE: roundtri
> While round-tripping would be interesting to those wanting use the
> layout power of InDesign, I'd also like to see the other (and I'll be
> harder) side of the round-trip, InDesign to DocBook.
A round-trip InDesign to DocBook is IMHO wasting of time. We should realize
that ID is not a text proc
o: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [docbook-apps] RFE: roundtripping to/from adobe IDML
>
>
> Hi,
> I would like to ask the docbook community if there is any interest in
> a new set of XSLT for rountripping between docbook and Adobe Indesign
> CS4+.
>
> Altoug
pen.org
> Subject: [docbook-apps] RFE: roundtripping to/from adobe IDML
>
> Hi,
> I would like to ask the docbook community if there is any interest in
> a new set of XSLT for rountripping between docbook and Adobe Indesign
> CS4+.
>
> Altough InDesign is non an open solutio
I work with several publishing clients, and I think this would be
absolutely welcomed! One of the main complaints I hear is a lack of
control over the look and feel with XSL-FO. With this approach, I think
many would be more willing to adopt single source DocBook, as they would
then have a way
Hi,
I would like to ask the docbook community if there is any interest in
a new set of XSLT for rountripping between docbook and Adobe Indesign
CS4+.
Altough InDesign is non an open solution, Adobe ha opened up its
InDesign file format by introducing IDML, IMHO an extremely well
thought xml rapres
