Hi,
sorry for the delay.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:04:53 +0200
Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 16.10.2014 10:56, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> > I'm not sure how easily could this be adapted to our current XSLT 1
> > base. Are there other (better?) solutions?
>
> If you will not use extensions, it should be
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:11:27 +0200
Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> Apart from this technical implementations, I'm more interested in the
> overall structure. What would be a "good" test environment for
> stylesheet customizations? Or even the DocBook stylesheets itself?
Start at the bottom? A basic 1.
On Thu, October 16, 2014 9:56 am, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> when developing customizations for the DocBook stylesheets I have
> always the feeling I forget something important and work without any
> "safey net". ;)
> As such, it would be great to have a "test framework" which could
> automatically
On 16.10.2014 10:56, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> I'm not sure how easily could this be adapted to our current XSLT 1
> base. Are there other (better?) solutions?
If you will not use extensions, it should be possible to run DocBook
XSLT stylesheets in XSLT 2.0 processor, hence use XSpec.
Hi Dave,
thanks for your reply! :)
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:25:40 +0100
davep wrote:
> [...]
> > How do *you* develop and test your stylesheets? Has anybody used
> > such frameworks? Any help is greatly appreciated. :)
>
> xspec is for the general case. Question: Is docbook sufficiently
> 'firm'
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:56:11 +0200
Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when developing customizations for the DocBook stylesheets I have
> always the feeling I forget something important and work without any
> "safey net". ;)
> As such, it would be great to have a "test framework" which could
> au
Hi,
when developing customizations for the DocBook stylesheets I have
always the feeling I forget something important and work without any
"safey net". ;)
As such, it would be great to have a "test framework" which could
automatically check the transformation results with the expected
behaviour.