At 13:50 14/03/2003 +0100, Gour wrote:
Jirka Kosek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From theoretical point of view RNG is cool schema language especially
> for grammar-based document types like DocBook. AFAIK there is zero
> support for RNG in XML content creation tools (editors). And you will
> have
Jirka Kosek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From theoretical point of view RNG is cool schema language especially
> for grammar-based document types like DocBook. AFAIK there is zero
> support for RNG in XML content creation tools (editors). And you will
> have same problem with entities as in XML sc
Gour wrote:
> > Be you, I would stay with DTD for DocBook documents.
>
> And what about Relax NG?
>From theoretical point of view RNG is cool schema language especially
for grammar-based document types like DocBook. AFAIK there is zero
support for RNG in XML content creation tools (editors). An
Jirka Kosek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Be you, I would stay with DTD for DocBook documents.
And what about Relax NG?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #278493
"Olson, Dave -Systems" wrote:
>
> Could someone give me a list of the advantages and disadvantages of using
> the DocBook DTD(s) vs. a DocBook XML Schema? I'm just starting a
DocBook DTD is more mature and proven technology. I think that XML
schema for DocBook is just early release for testing.
Could someone give me a list of the advantages and disadvantages of using
the DocBook DTD(s) vs. a DocBook XML Schema? I'm just starting a
documentation conversion project, using Cocoon (Xalan is XSLT engine). I've
never used either a DTD or XML Schema, so using either form of XML
technology invo
