"Juan R. Migoya" wrote:
You mention 5 or 6 tools: I would appreciate a link to some site about them. For
the time being, I only know about FOP.
http://www.xmlsoftware.com/xslfo/
I have very good experience with PassiveTeX.
All this said, I reckon things and changing fast and I can't keep
Phillip Shelton writes:
A tool that does not use java.
-Original Message-
... its hard to see what
DSSSL/Jade buys you (apart from processing SGML, of course)
of the FO implementations I know, 2 use Java, 2 use TeX, 1 is a
Windows program, 1 is a commercial thing,
Hi everyone,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:38:23AM +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
A tool that does not use java.
-Original Message-
... its hard to see what
DSSSL/Jade buys you (apart from processing SGML, of course)
Ha ha! Nice one, Phillip. I entirely agree with you.
I
Rune Enggaard Jensen writes:
Well, it gives _me_ a tool that generates RTF files. I have yet to hear of a
FO engine that gives me that. The second it is here, I will drop DSSSL
totally and start customizing Norm's FO style sheets at once (adding support
for productnumber and qandaset, for
"Sebastian Rahtz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(comparing DSSSL/Jade to XSL FO)
its hard to see what
DSSSL/Jade buys you (apart from processing SGML, of course)
Well, it gives _me_ a tool that generates RTF files. I have yet to hear of a
FO engine that gives me that. The second it is here, I will
