"Regarding your first question, if you put a role attribute on a phrase
(contents), the value of that role will be carried
to the HTML (e.g., contents)
You can then apply css normally.
Regarding your second question, I’m not so sure what’s the best thing to do,
but you might try the same approa
Just tested and it work's fine. Great.
Thank you very much.
Best regards
Volker
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:42:58 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
> I just had a look at the build.xml. As you might know, we use two xslt
> tasks to get the final webhelp output. First we profile the docbook
> document,
I just had a look at the build.xml. As you might know, we use two xslt
tasks to get the final webhelp output. First we profile the docbook
document, and then we do the actual webhelp transformation on that profiled
document. It seems that we have missed to set the
${xslt-processor-classpath} as the
I just processed the both files with Oxygen Editor V15 (Trial - Version).
Both files get processed without problems. So it must be my setup.
This is the part of my build.properties, but i'm not sure if they are getting
used.
...
xslt-processor-classpath=d:\\apps\\saxon\\saxon.jar
xercesImpl.jar=d
On 03/26/2014 04:56 AM, Volker Bernhard Duetsch wrote:
> can anyone please test the attached files. I'm not sure if it's the setup
> of the machine or the document structure...
>
> pass.xml -> fine result, everything works as expected
>
> failed.xml -> won't work. Only one table row
Hi,
I encounter problems by processing a docbook-xml test file of 11907 lines total
325.050 bytes. If I reduce file size it will be corectly processed... I've read
a
lot and asked some questions on stackoverflow, but problem still exists.
This works fine:
"Step 5: Test the package by running the
erprises
b...@sagehill.net
- Original Message -
From: "David Cramer"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook XML as an Output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/23/2011 08:09 AM, Dermot O'H wrote:
I'm stil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/23/2011 08:09 AM, Dermot O'H wrote:
> I'm still looking for a way to resolve processing instructions when running
> the profile.xsl template. Anyone?
For that you'll have to create a customization layer on top of the
profiling xsls and add into
The missing DocBook declaration can be resolved by including the following
line in the profile.xsl file (or including it via your customisation layer):
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd"/>
I'm still looking for a way to resolve processing instructions when running
the profil
Hi,
We maintain our doc alongside our code. When building a project our build
system also generates the doc output. Three things impact on the time it
takes to generate the docs:
1. The number of guides
2. The number of output formats
3. The number of different profiled versions of each guide
mber 29, 2010 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook xml title containing double quotation
marks causes CHM TOC issue
On 12/27/2010 08:32 PM, Tracy Huang Gmail wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion! I will install and try Saxon 6 later.
And enlightened by another user Sarah Cheng, I have wo
On 12/27/2010 08:32 PM, Tracy Huang Gmail wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion! I will install and try Saxon 6 later.
> And enlightened by another user Sarah Cheng, I have worked around the
> issue by adding the following Escape Characters (“ - left double
> quote, ” - right double quote) in the x
Regards
Tracy
- Original Message -
From: Bob Stayton
To: Tracy Huang Gmail ; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook xml title containing double quotation
marks causes CHM TOC issue
Hi,
Try using
Hi,
Try using Saxon 6 instead of xsltproc.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
b...@sagehill.net
- Original Message -
From: Tracy Huang Gmail
To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 5:26 PM
Subject: [docbook-apps] Docbook xml title containing
Hi All,
When I use double quotation marks ("") to quote a word in the xml
element, the generated CHM TOC entry only shows the word
qupted, not the complete title.
I have the following XML file (please note the quotation marks in the title
line: Loading "heavy" window):
http://docbook
/saxon-help
Mauritz
| -Original Message-
| From: SriKrishnan [mailto:srikrish...@techset.co.uk]
| Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 7:31 AM
| To: 'Mauritz Jeanson'; 'Dave Pawson'
| Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
| Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Docbook XML
SriKrishnan'
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Docbook XML and Catalog
| -Original Message-
| From: Dave Pawson
| >
| > F:\ADVENT\APP\xslf0_samples\DOCBOOK-samples\completed>java -cp
| > "C:/saxon/saxon.jar;C:/docbook-xsl-1.76.1-RC
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:51:34 +0100
"Mauritz Jeanson" wrote:
> | -Original Message-
> | From: Dave Pawson
> | >
> | > F:\ADVENT\APP\xslf0_samples\DOCBOOK-samples\completed>java -cp
> | > "C:/saxon/saxon.jar;C:/docbook-xsl-1.76.1-RC2/extensions/
> | > saxon65.jar;C:/xml-commons-reso
| -Original Message-
| From: Dave Pawson
| >
| > F:\ADVENT\APP\xslf0_samples\DOCBOOK-samples\completed>java -cp
| > "C:/saxon/saxon.jar;C:/docbook-xsl-1.76.1-RC2/extensions/
| > saxon65.jar;C:/xml-commons-resolver-1.2/resolver.jar;C:/fop-1.0/"
| > com.icl.saxon.StyleSheet -x org.ap
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:52:44 +0530
"SriKrishnan" wrote:
> Hi Dave Pawson,
>
> I am frankly saying I don't know anything about Java, Saxon and FOP.
> Now only I am trying to learn these for the purpose of generating PDF
> from the XML source.
atalog option for saxon?
One more thing.You need to
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:52:44 +0530
"SriKrishnan" wrote:
> Hi Dave Pawson,
>
> I am frankly saying I don't know anything about Java, Saxon and FOP.
> Now only I am trying to learn these for the purpose of generating PDF
> from the XML source.
>
> Now I am reading "DocBook XSL: The Complete Guide
quot;XSLT 2.0" Book. In this also I don't
found how to configure catalog option for saxon?
Thanks,
Srikrishnan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:da...@dpawson.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:41 PM
To: SriKrishnan
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subjec
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:05:05 +0530
"SriKrishnan" wrote:
> Hi Dave Pawson,
>
> As per your suggestion I have downloaded saxon 6.5.5. In this case the
> following error appears
>
> F:\ADVENT\APP\xslf0_samples\DOCBOOK-samples\completed>java -cp
> "C:/saxon/saxon.jar;C:/docbook-xsl-1.76.1-RC2/exten
cbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook XML and Catalog
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:23:03 +0530
"SriKrishnan" wrote:
> Hi Dave Pawson,
>
> Thanks for your immediate reply. I will keep this in mind always.
>
> But still there are some errors in the ne
- Original Message -
From: "SriKrishnan"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:53 AM
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Docbook XML and Catalog
Hi Dave Pawson,
Thanks for your immediate reply. I will keep this in mind always.
But still there are some errors in the next steps. C
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:23:03 +0530
"SriKrishnan" wrote:
> Hi Dave Pawson,
>
> Thanks for your immediate reply. I will keep this in mind always.
>
> But still there are some errors in the next steps. Can anybody help
> me to solve this?
>
> It seems that it throws error on docbook.xsl. But I di
et()
Transformation failed: Run-time errors were reported
Thanks,
Srikrishnan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:da...@dpawson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:14 PM
To: SriKrishnan
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook XML and Catalog
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:42:27 +0530
"SriKrishnan" wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
>
>
> I am working in Windows XP professional system.
>
>
>
> I am trying to convert FO file from Docbook xml using xml catalog.
>
>
>
> I have copied Saxon in the following path
> "C:\saxonhe9-2-1-5j\saxon9he.jar
Hi Friends,
I am working in Windows XP professional system.
I am trying to convert FO file from Docbook xml using xml catalog.
I have copied Saxon in the following path "C:\saxonhe9-2-1-5j\saxon9he.jar"
I have copied fop in the following path "C:\fop-1.0\"
I have copied "CatalogManage
Does anybody have experience using 'docbook2X-0.7.0' to convert
DocBook XML documents to Texinfo?
My tests with even the simplest article's or book's are disappointing
because I get te weirdest errors in at least one of the processing steps.
Michael
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like many of you use a pure-Java solution.
I've been developping a comprehensive, pure-java DocBook processing package
for 'normal' users, and the tools I chose are Xalan and Fop (because they're
portable).
With recent versions of Xalan and the DocBook XSLs I came up with this
little compa
Dave Pawson wrote:
> At 23:55 11/04/2002 +0200, Sven Kitschke wrote:
>
>> For those who are interested - here is another ant build file.
>
>
> Perhaps its not as uncommon as I thought!
> Thanks Sven.
>
>> Surely some tweaking and cleanup is necessary.
>
> Is it one of those products that you
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:04 AM
To: Sven Kitschke; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Docbook/XML, done with Java
At 23:55 11/04/2002 +0200, Sven Kitschke wrote:
>For those who are interested - here is another ant build file.
Perhaps its not as uncommon as I thought!
Tha
At 23:55 11/04/2002 +0200, Sven Kitschke wrote:
>For those who are interested - here is another ant build file.
Perhaps its not as uncommon as I thought!
Thanks Sven.
>Surely some tweaking and cleanup is necessary.
Is it one of those products that you keep thinking does more :-)
'Surely it
At 16:24 11/04/2002 -0400, Glass, Eric wrote:
>The attached zipfile contains what I am using, and a simple example book.
>This assumes you have all the necessary jars in your classpath, ant is set
>up, etc..
Thanks Eric, seems like it will do the business!
Regards DaveP.
Hi,
I've got this distribution called jdocbook which is an integration of
ant, java, stylesheets, catalog support etc. I've been pretty reluctant
to release it since I didn't really want to support it but if you are
interested I could do a limited release to a few people and then see if
I wan
For those who are interested - here is another ant build file.
I've used it with saxon, but a generic xslt-processor call is prepared
as target (not tested).
It produces pdf with fop or passivetex (miktex on win32), chunked and
unchunked html, JavaHelp and HtmlHelp files with its customization
sty
:07 PM
To: Matt Reynolds; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Docbook/XML, done with Java
At 12:56 11/04/2002 -0500, Matt Reynolds wrote:
>Ant is pretty much a "Java Make", but that doesn't do it proper
>justice. Read http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/manual/intro.htm
At 12:56 11/04/2002 -0500, Matt Reynolds wrote:
>Ant is pretty much a "Java Make", but that doesn't do it proper
>justice. Read http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/manual/intro.html for the
>whole deal.
>
>As it's written in Java, simply pick your favorite JVM.
>
>As to it's ability to process DocBoo
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 11:59, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Which is probably about as commercial as Daniel gets
>
> I'm curious about ant and comparative usage of the processors
> so I'd be happy for it to remain on list.
>
> Is ant the java equivalent of a script file that works on win32 and *nix?
>
>
At 16:24 10/04/2002 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > What is XSLTproc? That's vaguely familiar...
> >
> > Sending private (or even better, a link to a web page) works just as
> > well. But this is OK with me :)
>
> Hehe don't worry I will make a bit of advertizing:
> http://xmlsoft.org/X
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 15:44, Carlos wrote:
> If your system supports it I would very much recommend XSLTproc as the XSLT
> processor to use. After Using Xalan, Saxon, XT and XSLTproc I've found out
> that XSLTproc is a lot faster (maybe because it is written in C) easier to
> use and has a quick t
If your system supports it I would very much recommend XSLTproc as the XSLT
processor to use. After Using Xalan, Saxon, XT and XSLTproc I've found out
that XSLTproc is a lot faster (maybe because it is written in C) easier to
use and has a quick turnaround on feature requests and bug fixes.
On th
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Matt:
>
> I've used ant with XSLTproc, Xalan and (latest and greatest) with Saxon. The
> build.xml file is listed below. Apologies to the list, wasn't sure if I
> should send this to the list or privately.
Carlos,
I am happy you sent it to the list. I was s
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:10:31PM -0500, Matt Reynolds wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:14, Carlos wrote:
> > Matt:
> >
> > I've used ant with XSLTproc, Xalan and (latest and greatest) with Saxon. The
> > build.xml file is listed below. Apologies to the list, wasn't sure if I
> > should send th
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:14, Carlos wrote:
> Matt:
>
> I've used ant with XSLTproc, Xalan and (latest and greatest) with Saxon. The
> build.xml file is listed below. Apologies to the list, wasn't sure if I
> should send this to the list or privately.
>
> Carlos
What is XSLTproc? That's vague
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:03, Michael Cortez wrote:
> Although I'm using Saxon, I've found it to be much faster then Xalan. Using
> FOP for PDF output, but it's kind of "broken" in a few places (like tables.)
I'm not too attached to parsers/processors at the moment, so I'll give
anything a shot.
Matt:
I've used ant with XSLTproc, Xalan and (latest and greatest) with Saxon. The
build.xml file is listed below. Apologies to the list, wasn't sure if I
should send this to the list or privately.
Carlos
-- Begin build.xml file --
>> Regardless, I'm curious to know if anyone else out there is
>> using an all Java setup?
I am using Java and XML.
Although I'm using Saxon, I've found it to be much faster then Xalan. Using
FOP for PDF output, but it's kind of "broken" in a few places (like tables.)
The only "real" prob
My apologies if this is the wrong list. I'm new here.
Here at work, we've decided to use DocBook for our internal
documentation. It appears to do everything we need, and we've started
creating many documents already.
However, as we have varied levels of expertise, and various platforms to
supp
i.e: put the xml.dcl before your xml file when running nsgml or jade.
Juan R. Migoya
SPAIN
"E.L. Willighagen" wrote:
> Michael Charles Smith wrote:
> >
> > I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
> > have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade t
Michael Charles Smith wrote:
> I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
> have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade to process
> it. When I ran "nsgmls -sv test.doc"(the command it gives to test your
> setup of docbook in TDG, I got a whole bun
Michael Charles Smith wrote:
>
> I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
> have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade to process
> it. When I ran "nsgmls -sv test.doc"(the command it gives to test your
> setup of docbook in TDG, I got a whole b
I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade to process
it. When I ran "nsgmls -sv test.doc"(the command it gives to test your
setup of docbook in TDG, I got a whole bunch of errors, of the form:
/docbookx.d
Hi folks,
Happy new year and all the best.
In order to use docBook XML on OS X with my team, I've packaged everything
needed into an OS X package.
In fact's only Xalan and Fop with shell-script wrappers, and is quite
straightforward to use.
Once installed (everything goes to /Users/Shared/DocBo
> From: Benjamin Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have spent several hourse on the problem I posted before and have
> found out that:
>
> I am not getting chapter, section, figure numbers because the test
> for @label will be true even if I have no label attribute in the tag.
>
> Ex
Hello,
I have spent several hourse on the problem I posted before and have
found out that:
I am not getting chapter, section, figure numbers because the test
for @label will be true even if I have no label attribute in the tag.
Example:
a) the xml fragment:
My Sample Figure
b) the matching
Norm,
> | In any event, that is why I implemented the shading in the stylesheets
> | instead of CSS. There is no dependence on another file (and for that
> | matter, there is no dependence on the browser supporting CSS).
>
> I can take a hint. I checked in some patches yesterday that support
>
/ Dan York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Of course, I suppose another approach would be to put the CSS inside of
| the HTML file...
That's increasingly what I do.
| In any event, that is why I implemented the shading in the stylesheets
| instead of CSS. There is no dependence on anoth
Hi,
I must be missing something, but i thought XSLT stylesheets are there to
transform
to HTML or any other XML alike, why add another stylesheets to do the last
part?
If docbook was a really high level description of data, but it is not, it
is for books in general,
and therefore comes close to
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:04:54AM -0400, Dan York wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 01:20:38PM -0400, Jon Willeke wrote:
> > If you're only concerned about HTML, use a CSS stylesheet. My preference
> > is to shade screens, but not programlistings, so I use the following:
>
> The issue for the L
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan York [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> The issue for the LDP is that people very often download an HTML page
> (typically a version of a HOWTO document) and save it for
> later viewing.
> We know that from user comments. While I, too, would prefer a CSS
> s
Jeff Rancier wrote:
> I have a DocBook book written in XML (V4.1.2 of the DocBookx DTD) and want
> convert it to PDF. Is there a tool which will accomplish this?
There are many options. For all of them you will need DocBook
stylesheets available from http://docbook.sourceforge.net
1. You can u
Hello,
I have a DocBook book written in XML (V4.1.2 of the DocBookx DTD) and want
convert it to PDF. Is there a tool which will accomplish this?
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscr
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 01:20:38PM -0400, Jon Willeke wrote:
> If you're only concerned about HTML, use a CSS stylesheet. My preference
> is to shade screens, but not programlistings, so I use the following:
The issue for the LDP is that people very often download an HTML page
(typically a vers
Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 01:22:56PM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
> > This issue of a single DOCTYPE comes up again when you try
> > to edit the modular files (the system entities). I would
> > prefer to use a validating editor that loads the DTD when
> > editing a modular file.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 01:22:56PM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
> This issue of a single DOCTYPE comes up again when you try
> to edit the modular files (the system entities). I would
> prefer to use a validating editor that loads the DTD when
> editing a modular file. But I can't hsve a DOCTYPE
> d
I'm switching over from SGML/DSSSL/Jade to XML/XSL/Xalan.
I've got most things working OK except I can't find a parameter like
%shaded-verbatim% to make my program listings display with the nice grey
background.
Is there an easy way to do this? Does someone have a modified XSL template
that sh
On 01 Aug 2001 09:58:48 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 05:22:03PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > This isn't a docbook-per se question..
> >
> > what I'd _like_ to do is to have foo include a set of separate files
> > (say oen for each section of the article foo).
> >
> > H
> From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:33:52AM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
> > > > > "docbookx.dtd" [
> > >
> > >
> > > %foo;
> > > ]>
> > > &bar;
> >
> > Could you clarify this solution a bit? 8^)
> > If foo.xml is as Robert describes, then I think this will
>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:33:52AM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
> > > "docbookx.dtd" [
> >
> >
> > %foo;
> > ]>
> > &bar;
>
> Could you clarify this solution a bit? 8^)
> If foo.xml is as Robert describes, then I think this will
> fail. That is, if foo.xml contains declarations
> for individua
> From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 05:22:03PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > This isn't a docbook-per se question..
> >
> > Current I have a root document that has external entity references for a
> > bunch of articles:
> >
> > > "docbookx.dtd" [
> >
> >
>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 05:22:03PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> This isn't a docbook-per se question..
>
> Current I have a root document that has external entity references for a
> bunch of articles:
>
> "docbookx.dtd" [
>
>
> ]>
>
> test book
> &foo;
> &bar;
>
>
> where foo.xml looks s
This isn't a docbook-per se question..
Current I have a root document that has external entity references for a
bunch of articles:
]>
test book
&foo;
&bar;
where foo.xml looks something like
...
what I'd _like_ to do is to have foo include a set of separate files
(say oen for each sectio
/ Gershon L Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| I don't work for Arbortext. I'm just a satisfied customer.
My disclaimer is that I used to work for them, but I'll add that they
have pretty good support for print publishing using XSL FOs now, too.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Jeffrey Franks wrote:
> Gershon L Joseph wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> >
> > > My belief is that there is no reliable, mature, easy-to-use product to
> > > make PDF from Docbook. The nearest might be the Framemaker route,
> > > perhaps via DSSSL
Gershon L Joseph wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> > My belief is that there is no reliable, mature, easy-to-use product to
> > make PDF from Docbook. The nearest might be the Framemaker route,
> > perhaps via DSSSL, I suspect, but even that is a vale full of tears.
> >
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Holger Rauch wrote:
> The only problem I've had with this approach is that the ToC page numbers
> have NOT been generated and I did NOT find a way to update the ToC in
> neither Word nor StarOffice. How do I have to do it, so that the ToC shows
> up WITH page numbers?
1. Ope
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> My belief is that there is no reliable, mature, easy-to-use product to
> make PDF from Docbook. The nearest might be the Framemaker route,
> perhaps via DSSSL, I suspect, but even that is a vale full of tears.
>
> face it, getting high-quality typeset
At 08:59 25/07/2001, Holger Rauch wrote:
> > > Company colourscheme adjustments before I print... My instinct with
> PDF is
> > > to output to RTF, clean it up, add page breaks, add a nice cover page etc
> > > in Word (I can hear the sharp intake of breath!) and then print to the
> > > Acrobat
Title: RE: DOCBOOK-APPS: docbook xml - paper based outputs?
>The only problem I've had with this approach is that the ToC page numbers
>have NOT been generated and I did NOT find a way to update the ToC in
>neither Word nor StarOffice. How do I have to do it, so that the ToC
Hi!
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Nik Clayton wrote:
> [...]
> DSSSL stylesheets plus pdfjadetex. Unless your tables are really
> complicated.
Ok, but if tables become really complicated, you are lost with DocBook
anyway. Substituting a by a may be a solution in a
few cases, but doesn't work for all
Hi!
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> [...]
> > Company colourscheme adjustments before I print... My instinct with PDF is
> > to output to RTF, clean it up, add page breaks, add a nice cover page etc
> > in Word (I can hear the sharp intake of breath!) and then print to the
> > Acrobat
Jeffrey Franks writes:
> Can you suggest a solution for a Unix/Linux platform? I have a
> table intensive document in DocBook Xml that must get to PDF
> somehow. My expectation is that it would look like a real book,
> with a real index, and not look ugly.
Too vague a specification. what is
Jeffrey Franks writes:
> I realize everyone is doing their best. However, this would be amusing
> if there were not so much at stake.
caveat emptor. who ever said it was all easy?
> Seems applicable to the deplorable situation we face in order to
> get high quality PDF from DocBook Xml.
dep
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:48:18PM -0500, Jeffrey Franks wrote:
> Can you suggest a solution for a Unix/Linux platform? I have a table
> intensive
> document in DocBook Xml that must get to PDF somehow. My expectation is
> that
> it would look like a real book, with a real index, and not look ugly
Jirka Kosek wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Franks wrote:
>
> > Can you suggest a solution for a Unix/Linux platform? I have a table
> > intensive
> > document in DocBook Xml that must get to PDF somehow. My expectation is
> > that
> > it would look like a real book, with a real index, and not look ugly.
>
Jirka Kosek wrote:
>
> Nico Morgan wrote:
>
> > Is there an XSL template for RTF output?
>
> Actually not, but you may use DSSSL stylesheet and Jade to get RTF.
>
> > Company colourscheme adjustments before I print... My instinct with PDF is
> > to output to RTF, clean it up, add page breaks,
Nico Morgan wrote:
> Is there an XSL template for RTF output?
Actually not, but you may use DSSSL stylesheet and Jade to get RTF.
> Company colourscheme adjustments before I print... My instinct with PDF is
> to output to RTF, clean it up, add page breaks, add a nice cover page etc
> in Word (I
I am a new convert to Docbook, having discovered it doing a vague Google
search for xml single source documentation.
I run the technical documentation department for a new software company (in
fact, it's just me!).
My Holy Grail is a single-source documentation system, but it has to be
Windoz
> It seems that xmlinst is related to MSXML 3 and earlier.
> Is there a similar utility for MSXML 4? Well, the MSXML 4
> has the "preview" in the title.
>
> I am quite new to XML and to the MSXML support. Should I start
> with MSXML 3 SP 1?
Wow, I'm behind already. I used 3 when it was a "pre
Is there any experience with using MSXML 4?
Mark Pilgrim wrote...
> >> [viewing DocBook XML directly in MSIE]
> >>
> > You can download the new releases of the MSXML-Parser from
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com. Note that the parser installs itself
> > in a so called side-by-side mode. This mode do
>> [viewing DocBook XML directly in MSIE]
>>
> You can download the new releases of the MSXML-Parser from
> http://msdn.microsoft.com. Note that the parser installs itself
> in a so called side-by-side mode. This mode doesn't replace the
> parser within IE. You have to download and install anothe
R Signes schrieb:
>
> Greetings!
>
> This seems to make sense. After all, it can't be expected, I suppose,
> to have a built in stylesheet for every XML application under the sun.
> Is there a way to point it to a stylesheet? If so, will that work?
> Even if it only speaks CSS, I would imagine
Greetings!
Perhaps this is a naive question, but I've gotten the impression that
Microsoft Internet Explorer is fairly capable of parsing XML. When I
open a bare xml file with no DOCTYPE, it happily shows it as a formatted
tree. If I hand it a DocBook document, however, it complains that it
ne
95 matches
Mail list logo
