ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Cramer, David W (David) [mailto:dcra...@motive.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Februar 2011 00:26
> An: Rowland, Larry; Jirka Kosek; denis.bradf...@verizon.net
> Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Betreff: RE: [docbook-apps] Ideas for GSoC 2011
>
&
rka Kosek [mailto:ji...@kosek.cz]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:46 AM
To: denis.bradf...@verizon.net
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Ideas for GSoC 2011
Denis Bradford wrote:
> That said, Help 3 seems likely to eventually take hold. And since the
> outputs wil
rsday, February 10, 2011 8:46 AM
To: denis.bradf...@verizon.net
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Ideas for GSoC 2011
Denis Bradford wrote:
> That said, Help 3 seems likely to eventually take hold. And since the
> outputs will be mostly straight XHTML, maybe it'
Amen to that!
On 02/10/2011 10:45 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
or... of WebHelp
output.Almost any platform now supports applications written purely in
HTML, CSS and Javascript and packaged for easy installation. This is
something worth to explore. And it is more "sexy" then boring
VisualStudio h
Denis Bradford wrote:
> That said, Help 3 seems likely to eventually take hold. And since the
> outputs will be mostly straight XHTML, maybe it's not too risky to get
> started on the DocBook stylesheets.
Or we can decide not to wait for MS and build just packaging to Web
Widgets, or Air, or iPad
I second the motion, but maybe there's not a huge hurry. My 2₵:
Help 3 (official name: Microsoft Help Viewer) is currently used only in
Visual Studio (and MSDN, in some form) -- MS does not yet consider it a
general purpose replacement for HTML Help.
Help 3 design is still a moving target. Th
