Hi Norm,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Norman Walsh wrote:
> I'm going to be turning my hands to the XSLT 2.0 stylesheets for
> DocBook again soon, partly with an eye towards making them more
> production ready, partly to try a few experiments.
Thanks for clarifying that you'll be working on
> > 2. It doesn't actually simplify things. Oh, in theory it
> does, but in
> > practice, it's harder to debug because the document you're
> looking at
> > isn't actually the one being styled.
>
> That's true.
One useful thing would be to have a debug switch which that causes the
xslts to sp
Norman Walsh wrote:
> 1. It's very expensive. The entire document gets processed at least
> twice. While the idea of simplifying the "downstream" design seemed
> very attractive, I think the cost is too high.
I think that multiple passes over document are necessary anyway -- I
think that profilin
list some inlines you'll never use.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Camille Bégnis [mailto:cami...@neodoc.biz]
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:11 AM
> To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Rethinking XSLT 2.0 design
>
> Hi
Hi Norm and all,
My opinion on the subject is that we should try listing the cases (like
/section/info/title) why the first step is required.
And then see if the schema could not be simplified to make that first
step unnecessary.
I have found that this kind of choice is often confusing for the en
