Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs STATUS

2002-09-16 Thread André Malo
> slive 2002/09/16 09:08:07 > Some of the nested s in mod/mod_include.xml are not > working in mozilla. Probably enclosing some of the bare > paragraphs in would fix it. hmm, works fine here (mozilla 1.0.1/win32) however, I think, we should put every element into a subsection (-> h3) an

Re: Antwort: Re: Suggestion: add revision number to docs

2002-09-16 Thread Rich Bowen
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The HTML version of the docs files might have some tags like > > > or whatever, and all of these might be automatically filled > from the CVS data by using the proper variables. Just as a data point - I have received an ENORMOUS amount of

[NEW] platform/index.xml; platform/ebcdic.xml

2002-09-16 Thread Tim Gerundt
Hello! I transform the file "ebcdic.html" to xml. But i transform it for "manual/platform/"! So you can move it from "manual/" to "manual/platform/". I think, it fit better to this place. And i wrote a "index.xml" for the platform-docs. Only a little overview of the files. *ww* Tim Pl

Re: Suggestion: add revision number to docs

2002-09-16 Thread Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not make use of this information at this point as well? The HTML files are being generated anyway ... I side with Justin on this one. Yes, the information is useful, but that doesn't mean we have to place it in each file. There is a perfectly good place to get this

Antwort: Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Michael . Schroepl
Hi Joshua, > Because the directive index is something that needs to be fast-loading > and simple since it is used frequently. The quick reference will have > much more content, and will really require a large browser window. > > Other opinions. "pro large table": a) You can make it render fa

Antwort: Re: Antwort: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Michael . Schroepl
Hi Joshua, >> I don't think this is the way CSS is meant to be used. >> >> What about >> >> and >> >> (or which names you would like better) and specify the exact >> background colors in some CSS section (or file)? > Ehhh... Nitpicker ;-) um ... this seems to be the only thing I can do

Antwort: Re: Suggestion: add revision number to docs

2002-09-16 Thread Michael . Schroepl
Hi Justin, >> This could be done by writing $Revision$ into the file. The CVS will >> replace it to $Revision: x.y $, where x.y is the revision number. As >> long as this string exists, revision number will automatically be >> updated. > > I think this is a bad idea. -0. > There are much better

Re: New install.xml.de

2002-09-16 Thread Astrid Kessler
First, thank you, Irmund and Erik. Irmund: > < Selbstverständlich können Sie den Apache 2.0 auch so generieren und > installieren. > so - ohne Perl? Yes :-) > < ausdrücklich deaktiviert werden, wenn Sie sie nicht verwenden > möchten Vorschlag: z.B mod_userdir an example is a yood suggestion fo

Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Astrid Kessler
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> I would instead suggest to combine these work with the directive >> index. Why having two documents with mainly the same content? > > Because the directive index is something that needs to be fast-loading > and simple since it i

Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Joshua Slive
Astrid Kessler wrote: One specific question: Should we make this two-lines per directive and include the on the second line, or is that too much stuff? -0 I would instead suggest to combine these work with the directive index. Why having two documents with mainly the same content? Because the d

Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Astrid Kessler
> One specific question: Should we make this two-lines per directive and > include the on the second line, or is that too much stuff? -0 I would instead suggest to combine these work with the directive index. Why having two documents with mainly the same content? Kess

Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Erik Abele
Erik Abele wrote: Hi Joshua ! Here's a quick first-draft of a "directive quick reference" that shows the syntax/context/default of each directive. At minimum it is a good resources for documenters to check what things need to be fixed. Any opinions? Joshua. great! this was on my todo too, but

Re: New install.xml.de

2002-09-16 Thread Erik Abele
Well, this is the german translation of install.xml r.1.3. Could someone review it please? Kess Hi Kess... all in all it's fine for me as a native german speaker :-) some points below: l. 112: Foundation (FSF) ist empfhlenswert (Version 2.7.2 ist gut). Wenn ^e^ l. 257: w

Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Joshua Slive
Erik Abele wrote: Hi Joshua ! Here's a quick first-draft of a "directive quick reference" that shows the syntax/context/default of each directive. At minimum it is a good resources for documenters to check what things need to be fixed. Any opinions? Joshua. great! this was on my todo too, but

Re: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Erik Abele
Hi Joshua ! Here's a quick first-draft of a "directive quick reference" that shows the syntax/context/default of each directive. At minimum it is a good resources for documenters to check what things need to be fixed. Any opinions? Joshua. great! this was on my todo too, but I didn't get to it

Re: [NEW] win_compiling.xml;win_service.xml;windows.xml

2002-09-16 Thread Joshua Slive
André Malo wrote: * Tim Gerundt wrote: Ok, this are the other platform-docs in xml. Thanks again! committed. Dumb question to the people: Are win_compiling.xml and win_service.xml up to date? They seem to be obsolete. No. They desperately need some help. If anyone wants to take them on, I'm su

Re: [NEW] win_compiling.xml;win_service.xml;windows.xml

2002-09-16 Thread André Malo
* Tim Gerundt wrote: > Ok, this are the other platform-docs in xml. Thanks again! committed. Dumb question to the people: Are win_compiling.xml and win_service.xml up to date? They seem to be obsolete. nd -- s s^saoaaaoaaoaaaom a alataa aaoat a a a maoaa a laoata a oia

Re: Antwort: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think this is the way CSS is meant to be used. What about and (or which names you would like better) and specify the exact background colors in some CSS section (or file)? Ehhh... Nitpicker ;-) There is nothing particularly wrong with applying a style dir

[Patch] install.xml - reflect changes in configure system

2002-09-16 Thread Thom May
Hi, this chunk of the install page is no longer accurate; you can do ./configure --enable-layout=Debian --prefix=/blah and that works fine, with all options being respected. Cheers, -Thom -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <@jerenkrantz> Microsoft says that its Internet Explorer 5.1.5 update for

Antwort: quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Michael . Schroepl
Hi Joshua, > > > > I don't think this is the way CSS is meant to be used. What about and (or which names you would like better) and specify the exact background colors in some CSS section (or file)? Regards, Michael

w3c tidy

2002-09-16 Thread Rich Bowen
Word to the wise. "tidy -mi -xml" is NOT recommended for tidy'ing up XML. It inserted random line breaks all over the place, and a bunch of s everywhere for no apparent reason. -- Rich Bowen Apache - mod_perl - Perl - CGI http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/

quick reference

2002-09-16 Thread Joshua Slive
Here's a quick first-draft of a "directive quick reference" that shows the syntax/context/default of each directive. At minimum it is a good resources for documenters to check what things need to be fixed. Any opinions? Joshua. Title: Directive Quick Reference - Apache HTTP Server Modules | D

howto/ssi

2002-09-16 Thread Rich Bowen
I'm converting ssi.html to ssi.html, and apparently I dropped some text into this from an article I wrote for some e-zine, and never went back to make it more appropriate to the documentation. It's not very good. So, I'm going to complete the conversion, and then I'm going to attempt to make it a l