Re: [Review] mod_dav.xml split (Revision)

2002-11-12 Thread André Malo
* Joshua Slive wrote: > 1. I'd move the more complete example that is now under the Dav directive > up into the summary section. There is no point in encouraging people to > do silly things like open an unprotected DAV server. Then in the Dav > directive section, just include a warning to secure

Re: building httpd-docs-2.0

2002-11-12 Thread Tim Gerundt
* Joshua Slive wrote: >>I think it assumes, at minimum, that the build.sh and build.xml live in a >>subdirectory of manual and that the libs live in a subdirectory under >>them. btw: I've got a question about the "build.sh". I use Cygwin under Windows 98 to build the docs. When i use the origina

Re: building httpd-docs-2.0

2002-11-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Joshua Slive wrote: > > See: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html ah! thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: building httpd-docs-2.0

2002-11-12 Thread Joshua Slive
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > um, i've missed something i guess. now that the build > script has moved, how does it get invoked? what assumptions > does it make about locations? See: http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html I think it assumes, at minimum, th

building httpd-docs-2.0

2002-11-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
um, i've missed something i guess. now that the build script has moved, how does it get invoked? what assumptions does it make about locations? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Review] mod_dav.xml split (Revision) (was: [Review] mod_dav.xml split)

2002-11-12 Thread Joshua Slive
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, André Malo wrote: > * André Malo wrote: > > [mod_dav split] > > ok, since I'm currently sitting on typing some content, I've tried to > extend the dav docs, too. you'll find a new patch and a new mod_dav_fs.xml > attached for yet another review. As usual, looks very good.

Re: [Review] mod_dav.xml split (Revision) (was: [Review] mod_dav.xml split)

2002-11-12 Thread André Malo
* André Malo wrote: [mod_dav split] ok, since I'm currently sitting on typing some content, I've tried to extend the dav docs, too. you'll find a new patch and a new mod_dav_fs.xml attached for yet another review. nd -- sub the($){+shift} sub answer (){ord q [* It is always 42! *]