Re: CHM files 2.0.46

At 06:56 AM 5/23/2003, Eric wrote: >To summarize the POV: > >a) we ship the HTML documentation together with releases (as we do today) +1 >b) additional documentation formats (CHM, PDF, etc.) are generated and > published independently from releases and don't come with the actual > distribut

Re: CHM files 2.0.46

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> By the way, what do you think about localized HTML offline >> packages? (httpd-docs-x.y.z.$lang.tar.gz)? Creation is >> probably trivial, because we can adapt concepts/code from >> the chm creation stuff and build it easily with ant. >> Would such packages be useful i

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml

* Joshua Slive wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> +Determines, whether encoded path separators in URLs are >> allowed to >>be passed through > > I don't really understand what the comma is doing there. argh. A typical German vs. English issue :-) Thanks. nd -- s;.*

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml

On Wed, 21 May 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +Determines, whether encoded path separators in URLs are > allowed to >be passed through I don't really understand what the comma is doing there. Joshua. - To unsubscribe,

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml core .xml.de

Hi Erik, > I hope this is okay for you too :) As always: I am not a committer, i'm only lurking. ;-) Regards, Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CHM files 2.0.46

> * Joshua Slive wrote: > >> Personally, I'm not too concerned with matching docs releases exactly to >> code releases. People can easily use later docs releases with earlier >> versions of 2.0, as long as they pay attention to the "compatibility" >> notes. So I'd say we just release these whene

Re: Antwort: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml core .xml.de

Hi Michael, > Hi Erik, > >> IMHO it would be better to say >> 'Das Erlauben von Schrägstrichen impliziert nicht deren >> Dekodierung' or 'Das Erlauben von Schrägstrichen impliziert >> nicht die Dekodierung dieser'. > > what about > >> 'Das Erlauben von Schrägstrichen impliziert nicht die >> Dek

Antwort: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod core.xml core .xml.de

Hi Erik, > IMHO it would be better to say > 'Das Erlauben von Schrägstrichen impliziert nicht deren > Dekodierung' or 'Das Erlauben von Schrägstrichen impliziert > nicht die Dekodierung dieser'. what about > 'Das Erlauben von Schrägstrichen impliziert nicht die > Dekodierung derselben'? Reg

Re: CHM files 2.0.46

Hi Andy, > By the way, what do you think about localized HTML offline > packages? (httpd-docs-x.y.z.$lang.tar.gz)? Creation is > probably trivial, because we can adapt concepts/code from > the chm creation stuff and build it easily with ant. > Would such packages be useful in any way? which fil

Re: CHM files 2.0.46

* Joshua Slive wrote: > Personally, I'm not too concerned with matching docs releases exactly to > code releases. People can easily use later docs releases with earlier > versions of 2.0, as long as they pay attention to the "compatibility" > notes. So I'd say we just release these whenever we f

Re: CHM files 2.0.46

On Thu, 22 May 2003, André Malo wrote: > No further changes are expected, so I've built CHM files from the PRE2 tag. > These are available for review here: . +1 Personally, I'm not too concerned with matching docs releases exactly to code releases. People can ea