* Hiroaki KAWAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmm. It still happens, that different JREs (?) produce different
> > > iso-2022-jp output (i.e. any time someone builds all and diffs, he gets
> > > .ja.jis diffs.
> >
> > Well, at least mine removes bogus escape sequences and
> > produce more desi
> > Hmm. It still happens, that different JREs (?) produce different iso-2022-jp
> > output (i.e. any time someone builds all and diffs, he gets .ja.jis diffs.
>
> Well, at least mine removes bogus escape sequences and
> produce more desirable output but yeah, it still happens.
Last few months, I
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've always leaned towards the more relaxed side of review standards on
translations, but our concensus policy has always been to have reviews on
anything non-english.
I believe the original intention to have revie
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've always leaned towards the more relaxed side of review standards on
> translations, but our concensus policy has always been to have reviews on
> anything non-english.
I believe the original intention to have reviews on
translations was to prevent
André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. It still happens, that different JREs (?) produce different iso-2022-jp
> output (i.e. any time someone builds all and diffs, he gets .ja.jis diffs.
Well, at least mine removes bogus escape sequences and
produce more desirable output but yeah, it stil
