I was doing that and found out that vim now handles BOM automatically
in a very annoying way. The only way to set rid of it is to
:set nobomb
and then save the file.
Ok, I will give that a try. But vim/gvim/cream/a.n.other editor are not
showing any abnormalities.
But I will set tha
On Aug 2, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Thumbs,
Thanks, I have just looked at Cream (cream.sourceforge.net) which
comes with Vim. Neither of these show any malformed characters, or
the BOM.
I'll look at vim too then.
I was doing that and found out that vim now handles BOM auto
Thumbs,
Thanks, I have just looked at Cream (cream.sourceforge.net) which comes
with Vim. Neither of these show any malformed characters, or the BOM.
I'll look at vim too then.
Tony
Francois Gingras wrote:
Tony,
I had great success with gvim for windows in the past, when I needed to
rem
Tony,
I had great success with gvim for windows in the past, when I needed to
remove weird EOL characters. Perhaps you could give it a try.
On 8/2/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> André Malo wrote:
> [SNIP]
> >
> > Don't think so. The BOM (that's what it is) is usually inserted b
André Malo wrote:
[SNIP]
Don't think so. The BOM (that's what it is) is usually inserted by an editor
(notepad, for example).
Ok then, I was using editpad lite. Hmm. Let me see if a 'better' editor
does the same, as doing it in Windows is more convenient when I am on
the train.
Tony
n
* Tony Stevenson wrote:
> Crikey,
>
> That has just confirmed it, I think I will move to doing all my edits on
> my linux box instead. I always check, but those entries do not appear
> in my editor.
>
> However, it may also be Tortoise that is screwing them up.
Don't think so. The BOM (that's
On 8/2/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Crikey,
>
> That has just confirmed it, I think I will move to doing all my edits on
> my linux box instead. I always check, but those entries do not appear
> in my editor.
>
> However, it may also be Tortoise that is screwing them up.
It's p
Crikey,
That has just confirmed it, I think I will move to doing all my edits on
my linux box instead. I always check, but those entries do not appear
in my editor.
However, it may also be Tortoise that is screwing them up.
Sorry,
Tony
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 8/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[
On 8/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -
> +
Windows editor magic?
Joshua.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/08/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the minimum, I plan to notate "reverse-proxy (e.g. gateway server)"
> liberally throughout the explanation pages of the module and guides.
I guess the right place for this is the glossary which has no mention
of 'gateway' in this co
Erik Abele wrote:
> On 01.08.2007, at 21:32, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>> On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Thats fine, but please keep the term reverse-proxy in parallel for
>>> the reasons
>>> stated by others here. It may be a silly and incorrect term, but in
>>> con
11 matches
Mail list logo
