* Rich Bowen wrote:
> are we talking about the website, or the product documentation?
>
> The former, I can see an advantage to, but the latter I might take some
> convincing.
yep. I'm not.
nd
--
sub the($){+shift} sub answer (){ord q
[* It is always 42! *] }
print the
* Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2012, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Hmm. I think I misread. are we talking about the website, or the
> > product documentation?
> >
> > The former, I can see an advantage to, but the latter I might take
> > some convincing. We ship those docs with the product,
I don't know much about the CMS->SVN system. We use the revision numbers
heavily to track translation age. Does this continue to work?
nd
* Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Daniel Gruno
> > To: docs@httpd.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 11:36 A
Hello docs@,
I have read the responses from people on both the mailing list, off it,
and via other channels, as well as made a small non-scientific survey
among the users@ people that showed a big approval (93%) of adding
highlighting to the documentation, and it makes me quite happy that
people a
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Httpd Wiki" for change
notification.
The "Rewrite" page has been changed by DanielGruno:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Rewrite?action=diff&rev1=31&rev2=32
= mod_rewrite recipes and guides =
- 'Please note that these
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53080
Daniel Gruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Daniel