On Friday 04 May 2012 11:48:01 Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 04-05-2012 11:39, André Malo wrote:
> >> Yes, I added a test for "$is-chm or $is-zip or $metafile/basename =
> >> 'index'" so it would only add the comments for our online version and
> >> only for non-index pages. And if I managed to screw th
On 04-05-2012 11:39, André Malo wrote:
>> Yes, I added a test for "$is-chm or $is-zip or $metafile/basename =
>> 'index'" so it would only add the comments for our online version and
>> only for non-index pages. And if I managed to screw that up, I'm hoping
>> you'll lend a hand at fixing it :)
>
> Yes, I added a test for "$is-chm or $is-zip or $metafile/basename =
> 'index'" so it would only add the comments for our online version and
> only for non-index pages. And if I managed to screw that up, I'm hoping
> you'll lend a hand at fixing it :)
;-)
That's not enough, unfortuantely. The pr
- Original Message -
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 21:55:02 Daniel Gruno wrote:
> > On 03-05-2012 19:07, Igor Galić wrote:
> > > I'm pretty and sure that the disqus offers these things as well.
> > > And while I know that it's not the Apache Way, because, it wasn't
> > > invented here, I'm pr
On 04-05-2012 10:55, André Malo wrote:
>
> Another side note:
>
> We need to build a different version for online vs. shipped after integrating
> comments. I don't think it's reasonable to burden the locally installed docs
> with external references.
>
> nd
>
> ---
On Thursday 03 May 2012 21:55:02 Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 03-05-2012 19:07, Igor Galić wrote:
> > I'm pretty and sure that the disqus offers these things as well.
> > And while I know that it's not the Apache Way, because, it wasn't
> > invented here, I'm pretty sure it's a good idea to experiment
On 04-05-2012 02:13, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to integrate different languages? (And how do we moderate
>>> those?)
>>>
>>
>> I expect people can post in any language. We can then use google
>> translate
>> to moderate th
On May 3, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to integrate different languages? (And how do we moderate
>>> those?)
>>>
>>
>> I expect people can post in any language. We can then use google translate
>> to m
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Is it possible to integrate different languages? (And how do we moderate
those?)
I expect people can post in any language. We can then use google translate
to moderate them. That usually works well enough to understand the intent.
The be
>
> Is it possible to integrate different languages? (And how do we moderate
> those?)
>
I expect people can post in any language. We can then use google translate
to moderate them. That usually works well enough to understand the intent.
On 03-05-2012 22:06, André Malo wrote:
>
> Is it possible to integrate different languages? (And how do we moderate
> those?)
>
> nd
Yes, from what I have read about the embedded stuff so far, we can make
it distinguish between the various languages through the xslt by, for
example with the Fr
* Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 03-05-2012 19:07, Igor Galić wrote:
> > I'm pretty and sure that the disqus offers these things as well.
> > And while I know that it's not the Apache Way, because, it wasn't
> > invented here, I'm pretty sure it's a good idea to experiment with
> > something that alread
On 03-05-2012 19:07, Igor Galić wrote:
> I'm pretty and sure that the disqus offers these things as well.
> And while I know that it's not the Apache Way, because, it wasn't
> invented here, I'm pretty sure it's a good idea to experiment with
> something that already exists, because we invent and
- Original Message -
> On 03-05-2012 18:28, Igor Galić wrote:
> >
> >>> How does PHP documentation deal with the problem of spam?
> >>
> > [snip]
> >> "What is five minus one". But they also moderate the comments as
> >> they come in, which is a thankless job. I think that it's
> >> worth
On 03-05-2012 18:28, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>>> How does PHP documentation deal with the problem of spam?
>>
> [snip]
>> "What is five minus one". But they also moderate the comments as
>> they come in, which is a thankless job. I think that it's
>> worthwhile, but will require some folks volunteerin
> > How does PHP documentation deal with the problem of spam?
>
[snip]
> "What is five minus one". But they also moderate the comments as
> they come in, which is a thankless job. I think that it's
> worthwhile, but will require some folks volunteering to staff this.
> I volunteer.
hmmm… just lik
On May 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
> Please remember that there's an option to moderate
> comments. I'd send new comments to docs@ for review/approval.
> I don't know the exact workings of this, but if it's a
> link to approve that would be not so good. With docs@
> being a public ML
On May 3, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> I've long been a fan of the PHP documentation - specifically, the way that
>> they solicit commentary from readers, and then fold that commentary into the
>> docs. Not only did it encourage me to comment on the docs, it also got me
>> involve
- Original Message -
>
> On 3 May 2012, at 14:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I've long been a fan of the PHP documentation - specifically, the
> > way that they solicit commentary from readers, and then fold that
> > commentary into the docs. Not only did it encourage me to comment
> > on th
On 3 May 2012, at 14:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I've long been a fan of the PHP documentation - specifically, the way that
> they solicit commentary from readers, and then fold that commentary into the
> docs. Not only did it encourage me to comment on the docs, it also got me
> involved in the P
- Original Message -
> On 03-05-2012 15:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a way to integrate a third-party comment
> > service
> > like, say, disqus or whatnot, into our docs, so that we could get
> > direct
> > feedback from our audience? Or can you think of another way that
On 03-05-2012 15:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to integrate a third-party comment service
> like, say, disqus or whatnot, into our docs, so that we could get direct
> feedback from our audience? Or can you think of another way that we
> might do this?
>
I like the general idea
I've long been a fan of the PHP documentation - specifically, the way that they
solicit commentary from readers, and then fold that commentary into the docs.
Not only did it encourage me to comment on the docs, it also got me involved in
the PHP documentation project, at least marginally. The ba
23 matches
Mail list logo
