-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Querna wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
>> Would anyone object to setting the default logfile format to combined
>> rather than common? Apart from the "we've always done it that way" line,
>> is there any reason to leave it as is?
>
> FWIW, this is one
Rich Bowen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would anyone object to setting the default logfile format to combined
rather than common? Apart from the "we've always done it that way" line,
is there any reason to leave it as is?
FWIW, this is one of the first things I change o
* Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:40:27AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > I was under the impression that we considered the default configuration
> > file to be a part of the documentation.
>
> Oh, that might be.
I just want to note, that the default log format is part of mod_log_con
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:40:27AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I was under the impression that we considered the default configuration
> file to be a part of the documentation.
Oh, that might be.
> I wasn't aware that this caused
> non-negligible performance impact. That being the case, perhaps th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:25:07AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> Would anyone object to setting the default logfile format to combined
>> rather than common? Apart from the "we've always done it that way" line,
>> is there any reason
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:25:07AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Would anyone object to setting the default logfile format to combined
> rather than common? Apart from the "we've always done it that way" line,
> is there any reason to leave it as is?
>
Combined logs more, using more space and slowing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would anyone object to setting the default logfile format to combined
rather than common? Apart from the "we've always done it that way" line,
is there any reason to leave it as is?
- --
Rich Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
