trosities like the listing of % directives in
> mod_log_config.html.
True, to a point If text-only clients can now all reliably
handle tables, cool. But if they still look like crap,
then I'm opposed to changing them -- because someone setting
up a server doesn't necessarily have netw
sers like lynx that do not handle tables, but if we use tables
> intelligently, those people should still be able to use the docs.
>
> Any opinions?
mod_rewrite uses tables extensively, and I have not heard any
complaints. (I have some *other* complaints about the mod_rewrite docs,
but I
to mod_headers.html.) There are still people using
> browsers like lynx that do not handle tables, but if we use tables
> intelligently, those people should still be able to use the docs.
Huh? I believe lynx has handled tables for some time now.
But absolutely, tables are worthwhile, let
like the listing of % directives in
mod_log_config.html.
I suggest we do away with this rule and use s where appropriate. (I
just committed one to mod_headers.html.) There are still people using
browsers like lynx that do not handle tables, but if we use tables
intelligently, those people should
