Re: [libreoffice-documentation] GS Macro Chapter replacement

2011-08-04 Thread Martin Fox
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:11:03 +1000 Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > > > > I suppose that I have good news and bad news... > > > > > Thanks for reporting these problems, Andrew. > > Evidently the person who final-checked that file

[libreoffice-documentation] File naming proposal

2011-08-04 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
Before we leap into renaming the files, I'd like to mention what the numbers mean. This info is in "Producing LibreOffice User Guides" btw. --- File names take the following form: AABBCC3-Name, where AA=book number, BB=chapter number, CC=book initials, 3=LibreOffice V3 (s/w version

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Base

2011-08-04 Thread planas
Tom On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:07 -0600, Tom Cloyd wrote: > On 08/01/2011 05:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > > Hi :) > > I have been getting the same impression of Base as Jean. Apparently Base > > has > > different unpredictable flaky quirks in different releases. There appear > > to be > > too ma

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Base

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Cloyd
On 08/01/2011 05:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I have been getting the same impression of Base as Jean. Apparently Base has different unpredictable flaky quirks in different releases. There appear to be too many complex issues for any of it to be sorted out in a reasonable time-frame. Regards

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Base

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Cloyd
On 08/01/2011 05:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) I have been getting the same impression of Base as Jean. Apparently Base has different unpredictable flaky quirks in different releases. There appear to be too many complex issues for any of it to be sorted out in a reasonable time-frame. Regards

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] GS Macro Chapter replacement

2011-08-04 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > > I suppose that I have good news and bad news... > > I do take exception to a few items that were done while converting this > from OOo to LO (as it were); and perhaps a few dumb things that I may > have done... > [snip] > >

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] GS Macro Chapter replacement

2011-08-04 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 08/02/2011 09:40 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) The Macros chapter's Pdf needs replacing fairly quickly. At the moment it shows editing changes with deleted text in red and scored through with a line. The Odt is fine, it's just the Pdf that's gone wonky. I used Alfresco to get rough dates ont

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
From: Ian Leyton To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 22:47:03 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters On 5/08/11 7:34 AM, Tom Davies wrote: > > > From: Ian Leyton > To: docume

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Ian Leyton
On 5/08/11 7:34 AM, Tom Davies wrote: From: Ian Leyton To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 22:18:46 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters On 4/08/11 10:26 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) That's nice but i thin

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
From: Ian Leyton To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 22:18:46 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters On 4/08/11 10:26 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > That's nice but i think it's a good idea to keep the note

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Ian Leyton
On 4/08/11 10:26 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) That's nice but i think it's a good idea to keep the note about right-click. It might be good to expand on that little table if possible. Perhaps adding the info about how to redefine the new right-click is worth adding to that note? Regards from Tom

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) That's nice but i think it's a good idea to keep the note about right-click. It might be good to expand on that little table if possible. Perhaps adding the info about how to redefine the new right-click is worth adding to that note? Regards from Tom :) __

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 19:54 +1000, Ian Leyton wrote: > On 4/08/11 6:37 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 09:05 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > >> ... it might also be good for the Mac's quick little table at the start > >> of all guides to show key combination equivalents of right-

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Ian Leyton
On 4/08/11 6:37 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 09:05 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: ... it might also be good for the Mac's quick little table at the start of all guides to show key combination equivalents of right-click and stuff. Yes, definitely on the list for those chapters a

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 09:05 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > ... it might also be good for the Mac's quick little table at the start > of all guides to show key combination equivalents of right-click and stuff. Yes, definitely on the list for those chapters and books that don't already have that info.

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Bug-Report Guide & accessibility

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Ahah, added a couple of ideas there. Mostly just what has already been suggested (and not retracted) in the lists. Regards from Tom :) From: Jean Hollis Weber To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Thu, 4 August, 2011 4:16:31 Subject: Re: [libre

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Repeating Chapters

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) +1 I think the type of re-structuring i suggested wouldn't work. If it made sense to repeat entire chapters then it might work but it would be too complicated & confusing for odd paragraphs or pages scattered around the place. Context is tough enough sometimes without worrying about wh