Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco Workflow Questions

2011-02-05 Thread Tom Davies
blish? Regards from Tom :) From: John M. Dlugosz To: documentation@libreoffice.org Sent: Sat, 5 February, 2011 4:46:09 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco Workflow Questions Documents are edited, reviewed, proofed, and proofed again. So what am I

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco Workflow Questions

2011-02-04 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:46, John M. Dlugosz wrote: > But typos, small formatting nits, and punctuation?  Easier to fix than to > explain!  Do I make such changes with change-tracking turned on and let the > next proofer vet it? My 2 cents is that this sounds like the wisest choice.

[libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco Workflow Questions

2011-02-04 Thread John M. Dlugosz
Documents are edited, reviewed, proofed, and proofed again. So what am I supposed to do in the 'review' or 'proof' stage? Fix things myself? I think that serious content problems would get a 'comment' and sent back to drafts; likewise something that needs discussion. But typos, small format