Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Calc Guide status & question re angle brackets in paths

2011-03-26 Thread Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Le 26/03/2011 02:37, Barbara Duprey a écrit : Besides being arrows, they're also in OOoComputerCode style (Liberation Sans Mono), and they'd be better back in OOoMenuPath. That would take longer than the simple F&R, right? The AltSearch extension might be of help here. Thus, IMO, these Find

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Calc Guide status & question re angle brackets in paths

2011-03-25 Thread Barbara Duprey
On 3/25/2011 6:27 PM, Hal Parker wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote: On 3/19/2011 8:20 PM, Hal Parker wrote: I am now turning my attention to the Calc Guide, which Barbara has rebranded from the OOo version. I've started replacing images and checking for info that i

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Calc Guide status & question re angle brackets in paths

2011-03-25 Thread Hal Parker
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote: > On 3/19/2011 8:20 PM, Hal Parker wrote: > >> I am now turning my attention to the Calc Guide, which Barbara has >> rebranded >> from the OOo version. I've started replacing images and checking for info >> that is incorrect for LibO. >> >> O

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Calc Guide status & question re angle brackets in paths

2011-03-25 Thread Barbara Duprey
On 3/19/2011 8:20 PM, Hal Parker wrote: I am now turning my attention to the Calc Guide, which Barbara has rebranded from the OOo version. I've started replacing images and checking for info that is incorrect for LibO. One question, regarding the path indicators (angle bracket> versus arrow): t

[libreoffice-documentation] Calc Guide status & question re angle brackets in paths

2011-03-19 Thread Hal Parker
I am now turning my attention to the Calc Guide, which Barbara has rebranded from the OOo version. I've started replacing images and checking for info that is incorrect for LibO. One question, regarding the path indicators (angle bracket > versus arrow): the consensus awhile ago appeared to be tha