Regarding  updating guides for minor releases, I do not agree with focusing
exclusively on things in the Release Notes. I am finding some differences
between Writer v7.0 and 7.1 that I consider important for users but are too
minor for the release notes.

I do agree that in most cases only one reviewer is enough.

Jean

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 13:07 Rafael Lima <rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello everyone!
>
> Here's my take on this subject.
>
> I believe that when updating the guides to minor releases (7.1 to 7.4) we
> should focus exclusively on the aspects listed in the Release Notes. Hence,
> we should take the previously published version (say 7.0 now) and update
> only chapters and sections that are directly related to something listed in
> the release notes. If something was not mentioned in the release notes,
> then it should remain unchanged.
>
> If we follow this guideline, we can reuse previous chapters entirely. This
> way, if only a single person reads a chapter and concludes that it has not
> been affected by any changes in the release notes, then no further reviews
> are necessary and no modifications are made to the chapter.
>
> For chapters affected by the release notes, then I believe one person
> updating it and a subsequent single review will suffice.
>
> I think this is a great topic for this week's meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Rafael Lima
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:31 PM Felipe Viggiano <felipeviggi...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Olivier,
> >
> > Considering your arguments, we need, at least, to think about reducing
> the
> > cycle review for minor releases reviews.
> > Kees has a point about the few number of changes in the software to
> > implement in the guides, and, in my opinion, giving the same treatment
> for
> > major and minor releases is consuming most of the team's time.
> > Maybe reducing the requisites for updating the guides in minor releases,
> we
> > can use the time to work on some other projects.
> >
> > Is there any idea from the team to implement a reduced workflow for minor
> > releases?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Felipe Viggiano
> >
> > Em seg., 15 de mar. de 2021 às 20:12, Olivier Hallot <
> > olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org> escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi Team
> > >
> > > I strongly oppose to this approach.
> > >
> > > Catching up a full version demands a lot of effort and delays the
> > > availability of the Guides much after the release of the software.
> > >
> > > We had a lot of work to bring our documentation from release 4.x to 5.x
> > > and now 7.x . We had to skip some releases because we could not match
> > > the release pace.
> > >
> > > Small updates and frequent publication (6 months) is, as you see, much
> > > easier to track and provide a good doc for end users. Many chapter just
> > > don't need changes and can be fully reused. Other chapters need
> in-depth
> > > reviews.
> > >
> > > Imagine purchasing the latest proprietary software and get a 2y-old
> > > manual in a promise that "will soon be available". Of course
> LibreOffice
> > > is not a proprietary software and documentation is produced by
> > > volunteers that have their own tempo.
> > >
> > > Software with no documentation is a lesser software. Doc and software
> > > are components of a product offering.
> > >
> > > Producing a new book with small updates is easier, quicker and may not
> > > require a full cycle review.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Olivier
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 14/03/2021 22:19, Felipe Viggiano escreveu:
> > > > Hello Kees,
> > > >
> > > > I was just thinking about that either, perhaps we can focus the
> review
> > on
> > > > the major releases, such as LibreOffice 7, LibreOffice 8 and so on.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Olivier Hallot
> > > LibreOffice Documentation Coordinator
> > >
>

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: documentation+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Reply via email to