Dave Barton wrote:
> Hi Milos,
>
> I am still investigating, but I am reasonably sure it is not your script
> that is the problem. I may have unintentionally mislead you by referring
> to "cross-references", the links in your files appear to be correct, but
> I am finding errors in the written text
Hi Milos,
I am still investigating, but I am reasonably sure it is not your script
that is the problem. I may have unintentionally mislead you by referring
to "cross-references", the links in your files appear to be correct, but
I am finding errors in the written text for those links which are not
Googlemail wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:17:36 +0200
> Dave Barton wrote:
>
>> Hi Milos,
>>
>> Don't be too quick to blame your script, it might not be the cause of
>> the issue I have encountered. I copied all the files (the originals,
>> yours and Hazel's corrections) over to another computer
Hi Dave,
meanwhile I have studied the problem a bit deeper and found out that
update of the table of contents updates the references too.
I've also tested the script - it does not change page numbering (in fact
it cannot do that, it does not enter such tags). Normally, when removing
a large piece
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:17:36 +0200
Dave Barton wrote:
> Hi Milos,
>
> Don't be too quick to blame your script, it might not be the cause of
> the issue I have encountered. I copied all the files (the originals,
> yours and Hazel's corrections) over to another computer with a different
> version
Hi Milos,
Don't be too quick to blame your script, it might not be the cause of
the issue I have encountered. I copied all the files (the originals,
yours and Hazel's corrections) over to another computer with a different
version of Writer and now I am seeing something different. I am starting
to
Dear Dave,
I am sorry to have caused problems. I've even compared the original and
corrected document, did not see any differences. Since LO does not
compare everything, this may be the reason why I did not notice.
I do not know how did this happen. There is, however, a very simple way
how to cor
Hi Dave,
Le 22/10/2014 22:05, Dave Barton a écrit :
> Hazel Russman wrote:
>
> 8<-- snip -->8
>
>> Nothing needs to be redone. All that is needed is to use LO's
>> built-in merge facility to merge the published version with the two
>> corrected versions. It will flag up all changes and you can de
Hi :)
Ok, i keep not understanding what's happening.
Was that done to the old version of the chapter before the chaps did all
the work on clearing x-refs and stuff? So are they having to re-do all
their work, or is it just Hazel's work that needs to be re-done?
Is it kinda working? Is the work-
Hazel Russman wrote:
8<-- snip -->8
> Nothing needs to be redone. All that is needed is to use LO's
> built-in merge facility to merge the published version with the two
> corrected versions. It will flag up all changes and you can decide
> which ones to incorporate.
It appears that we have a bi
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:19:04 +0100
Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Ok, i keep not understanding what's happening.
>
> Was that done to the old version of the chapter before the chaps did all
> the work on clearing x-refs and stuff? So are they having to re-do all
> their work, or is it just Hazel's
I have uploaded a version of this to the feedback folder.
--
Hazel
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: documentation+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquet
12 matches
Mail list logo
