[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

2020-11-19 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Submitted an equivalent proposal to Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-ubuntu/-/merge_requests/1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754804 Title:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

2020-11-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package fonts-ubuntu - 0.83-4ubuntu2 --- fonts-ubuntu (0.83-4ubuntu2) hirsute; urgency=medium * Change directly the section in the control rather than using a vendor override of the gencontrol target, that's not upstreamable to Debian but easier for

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

2020-11-19 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754804 Title: "fonts-ubuntu" package is mar

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

2020-11-19 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
fonts-ubuntu is shipped by default on Ubuntu systems. It has significant reverse dependencies and cannot be uninstalled easily. Debian considers fonts-ubuntu to be “non-free” while Canonical disagrees. Recently I have seen two Ask Ubuntu questions where users have run vrms, found fonts-ubuntu to b