Submitted an equivalent proposal to Debian:
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-ubuntu/-/merge_requests/1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754804
Title:
This bug was fixed in the package fonts-ubuntu - 0.83-4ubuntu2
---
fonts-ubuntu (0.83-4ubuntu2) hirsute; urgency=medium
* Change directly the section in the control rather than using a
vendor override of the gencontrol target, that's not upstreamable to
Debian but easier for
** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754804
Title:
"fonts-ubuntu" package is mar
fonts-ubuntu is shipped by default on Ubuntu systems. It has significant
reverse dependencies and cannot be uninstalled easily. Debian considers
fonts-ubuntu to be “non-free” while Canonical disagrees.
Recently I have seen two Ask Ubuntu questions where users have run vrms,
found fonts-ubuntu to b
4 matches
Mail list logo