Ok, that was just a thought and strictly unrelated to the contents of
this bug discussion.
Thanks for your patience with multiple clarifications and own efforts to
nail down the problem. Closing the bug then.
** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You receiv
The README for fonts-liberation2 says:
* This is fonts-liberation v2 packaged in a separate source package.
The binary package is co-installable with fonts-liberation v1
by installing the actual TTF files into a different directory
(i.e. /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation2).
Si
Thanks for your follow-up, mrvanes. I didn't even know that there are
two fonts-liberation variants.
Hmm.. I see that both fonts-liberation and fonts-liberation2 are
installed by default on standard Ubuntu (both 22.04 and 23.04), which
explains why I wasn't able to confirm any regression with resp
Ok, I solved the problem. There were many coincidences playing a role in
this report.
For starters the (real) regression in fonts-ubuntu triggered my
attention, but unlucky testing against Liberation Sans revealed a change
in hinting between fonts-liberation and fonts-liberation2, which wasn't
ins
4 matches
Mail list logo
