** Tags removed: lunar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906
Title:
24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
and title bar
St
Public bug reported:
The Terminal font is missing when fonts-ubuntu-classic is installed on
noble.
** Affects: fonts-ubuntu-classic (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Tags: noble visual-quality
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2024-04-01 22-18-42.png"
https://bugs.
** Summary changed:
- Printing Ubuntu Bold font - strange symbol
+ Cyrillic characters not spaced correctly when printing with Ubuntu Bold font
** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Yo
Please try printing to a PDF or PS file so we can see if the error
exists in the data being printed, or just in the final printout.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
To confirm it's installed properly, please reboot and also verify the
Ubuntu font looks a little different now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036274
Title:
I'm not sure this will work for 23.04 but please try installing
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-ubuntu-
classic/0.83-6ubuntu2/+build/26430042/+files/fonts-ubuntu-
classic_0.83-6ubuntu2_all.deb from 23.10. It will "downgrade" the Ubuntu
font to the old one. Assuming it installs correctly
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2036274
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bu
** Package changed: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu) => language-pack-gnome-en
(Ubuntu)
** Also affects: language-pack-gnome-en-base (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ub
If I understand correctly the offending character is U+2236 ("RATIO")
(UTF-8: e2 88 b6) but that's part of the Unicode Mathematical
Operators block for which neither the new or old Ubuntu fonts have any
support. So it doesn't make sense to blame this on the Ubuntu fonts.
What I think is happenin
Yes it does feel like a regression in the font package which is why this
bug is assigned to that. We should find a way to extract the unicode for
the colon being used in US English and see what it looks like in the new
font to see if just the new font is to blame.
--
You received this bug notific
I think this is a consequence of failing to customise region settings,
which feels like a recent installer change.
I've asked around and the only feedback I've got has been that failing
to customise region settings *is* a bug. But at the same time it doesn't
make sense for us to mis-render the col
Would I be correct in thinking only the second one in that list is free
from the bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033377
Title:
New whitespace between d
Perhaps confirm the theory that the bug only occurs when $LANG is set to
C.UTF-8 or en_US.UTF-8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033377
Title:
New whitespace
Is this perhaps a new installer bug? Is the mantic installer failing to
apply language and region settings?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033377
Title:
Ne
It looks like the unusual colon character is the default (so used by US and C
locales):
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/-/merge_requests/66/diffs#5c873de36a1b57f9c8b16c7fb9cd64292a431fb2_154_156
So is it just how the new Ubuntu font renders the USA time separator?
** Also affects: f
No problem. Please open a separate issue for each specific rendering
problem upstream at: https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-fonts/issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Tags removed: visual-quality
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025282
Title:
UI fonts in 23.04 look bad compared to 22.10
Status in fonts-ubuntu package i
The old font looks better to me too, but I think this is a design
decision that's probably here to stay. We have two workarounds on the
way:
1. The ability to install the old "legacy" Ubuntu font side-by-side.
2. The ability to change the font weight in GNOME Tweaks (bug 2019906
needs fixing).
-
** Tags added: a11y lunar mantic visual-quality
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025282
Title:
UI fonts in 23.04 look bad compared to 22.10
Status in fonts-
** Summary changed:
- 23.04 : condensed fonts can't be used for interface and title bar
+ 23.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title
bar
** Package changed: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: lunar
--
You received this bug notificat
** Tags added: lunar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019045
Title:
[snap] New Ubuntu font with normal weight displayed as bold in Google
Docs in Chromium
Ironically I'm dealing with ubuntu-dock code right now that mentions
"dock.dash" as in the dash is a member of the Ubuntu dock. But that's an
implementation detail...
Given how freely extensions might change things I would lean toward
never mentioning "dash" or "dock" in menu items. Like "Move to
I'm not sure I agree with this, but do appreciate the wording is
confusing in a world of dash and dock.
* Regular users are less likely to understand "pinned" as much as "favourites".
* Power users may have no dock, only a dash, and so the existing wording is
correct.
* It's a patch we would have
** Tags added: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971072
Title:
Missing new Ubuntu logo (2022)
Status in fonts-ubuntu package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1743058 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743058
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1736452
Password field changes height as you type in it
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1743058
Input field height changes slightly when enter
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1743058 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743058
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1743058
Input field height changes slightly when entering in st password fields.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Document
** Tags added: bionic cosmic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736452
Title:
Password field changes height as you type in it
Status in fonts-ubuntu package i
Partially confirmed on bionic, but maybe not.
LibreOffice writer: Bug exists and "Light" is heavier if you type in
"Ubuntu Light". However if you use "Ubuntu" and right-click on text to
choose Character... > Style=Light, then it is correctly lighter. No bug.
gnome-font-viewer: No bug (light is in
Yeah I noticed QML_DISABLE_DISTANCEFIELD=1 made no improvement.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536751
Title:
Font/text rendering is irregula
** No longer affects: qtmir
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536751
Title:
Font/text rendering is irregular and not pixel-aligned on low DPI
It might be acceptable if the hinting was higher quality, but I think
that would require caching of whole strings (possibly with kerning)
rather than caching of individual glyphs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubun
Also the two lower-case u's in "Ubuntu App Test" have particularly
different appearance.
It seems Qt is placing glyphs according to a higher fractional precision
than the resolution of the display, which while technically correct also
creates unacceptable blurring of text at low DPI.
--
You rece
I can now see part of the problem more clearly.
If you look at labels that contain the same letter multiple times like
"Calculator" or "Security & Privacy", then it becomes apparent that the
clarity of that same letter changes depending on where it is in the
word.
Given that Qt caches individual
** Also affects: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536751
Title
Found this image today, showing Unity8's font rendering next to GTK's:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/290523497/IMG_1258.JPG
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed i
Technically not really a High bug, but we should keep a close eye on the
number of visual regressions in Unity8 compared to Unity7. So that
overall problem is itself High.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-
** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: unity8-desktop
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
When it's fully extended the fonts look bad. So this is not a texture
coordinate problem. I think the surface texture is correctly pixel
aligned but we haven't yet made sure the font hinting within the surface
is also pixel-aligned. Unity7 text still looks nicer and more polished
than Unity8.
--
Just noticed this bug again, now in System Settings. On Unity7 it's
perfectly clear (sub-pixel RGB) but in Unity8 it's slightly blurry
(greyscale is used). So that's the first part of the problem.
The second part of the problem is that Unity8 (especially in the
indicator pulldown) failing to apply
Yeah thanks. Sub-pixel appears to partially work, although I suspect we
have the RGB/BGR ordering backwards. And that's not surprising because
of bug 1393578. Unity8 has no way of knowing the correct sub-pixel
ordering while Mir doesn't provide it.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
It just occurred to me, the visual quality of text rendering would
improve a lot with sub-pixel rendering vs the greyscale rendering we
see. So Mir needs to expose sub-pixel ordering information before we can
do that --> bug 1393578
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Tags added: visual-quality
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536751
Title:
Font/text rendering is irregular and not pixel-aligned on low DPI
Reopened again. Although the situation definitely got better at the
start of April, font rendering in Unity8 still looks quite poor when
compared to Unity7.
The problem might just be misaligned textures like Unity8 bug 1510382.
** Changed in: harfbuzz (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
**
Seems to be totally fixed in xenial today!
Can anyone confirm what package fixed it?
** Changed in: harfbuzz (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
The problem is seemingly reduced in xenial now with the new visual
design. But the problem is not eliminated.
Fonts in the indicator pulldown (on desktop) are still not very well pixel
aligned. At a guess, it looks like we might have made any of these mistakes:
(a) Insufficient hinting
(b)
** Summary changed:
- QML Unreadable small fonts on 1366x768 screen
+ Font/text rendering is irregular and not pixel-aligned on low DPI screens
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
Beware of bug 433897. For many of us, the console font is (randomly)
never set (on random machines).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724022
Titl
47 matches
Mail list logo
