I set out to fix this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dolfin/+bug/868465
but things spread out and I ended up touching all the la files.
I won't push this to trunk until I've done some more testing, but
here's a summary of the changes:
1. Each solver defines a set of available methods and
This is great!
I have always thought we need to do something with this. However, I wonder if
list_foo is the best name?
What bothers me is the list. We have by purpose skipped most get from
methods, as it is implicit for what you want. What with just:
lu_methods (also see below),
And btw boost::assign is very handy!
--
Anders
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 04:47:56PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
It would be handy to also have
bool has_method(foo);
Garth
On 7 October 2011 14:20, Anders Logg l...@simula.no wrote:
I set out to fix this bug:
On Friday October 7 2011 08:56:04 Anders Logg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:44:16AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote:
This is great!
I have always thought we need to do something with this. However, I
wonder if list_foo is the best name?
What bothers me is the list. We have by purpose
Is the time right for beta2?
Garth
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
I just added a bug(blueprint) for me to fix for the wrapping of the solver
listings. But that can wait until after the release.
Johan
On Friday October 7 2011 12:42:50 Garth N. Wells wrote:
Is the time right for beta2?
Garth
___
Mailing list:
On Friday October 7 2011 11:42:51 Johan Hake wrote:
On Friday October 7 2011 08:56:04 Anders Logg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:44:16AM -0700, Johan Hake wrote:
This is great!
I have always thought we need to do something with this. However, I
wonder if list_foo is the best
7 matches
Mail list logo
