Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Anders Logg
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:49:51AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > On 05/07/11 07:24, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:46:00PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 04/07/11 23:37, Anders Logg wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:28:56PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Garth N. Wells
On 05/07/11 07:24, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:46:00PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> >> On 04/07/11 23:37, Anders Logg wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:28:56PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: On 04/07/11 17:22, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 201

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:46:00PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > On 04/07/11 23:37, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:28:56PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 04/07/11 17:22, Anders Logg wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Garth N. Wells
On 04/07/11 23:37, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:28:56PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> >> On 04/07/11 17:22, Anders Logg wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: On 04/07/11 16:44, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 201

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:28:56PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > On 04/07/11 17:22, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 04/07/11 16:44, Anders Logg wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:39:04PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Garth N. Wells
On 04/07/11 17:22, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> >> On 04/07/11 16:44, Anders Logg wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:39:04PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: I'm not sold on the NonlinearVariationalProblem interface. I would p

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > On 04/07/11 16:44, Anders Logg wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:39:04PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> I'm not sold on the NonlinearVariationalProblem interface. I would > >> prefer a constructor takes the Jacobian as an

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Garth N. Wells
On 04/07/11 16:44, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:39:04PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> I'm not sold on the NonlinearVariationalProblem interface. I would >> prefer a constructor takes the Jacobian as an argument. It's much >> cleaner to do things at construction and removes th

Re: [Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Anders Logg
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:39:04PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > I'm not sold on the NonlinearVariationalProblem interface. I would > prefer a constructor takes the Jacobian as an argument. It's much > cleaner to do things at construction and removes the need to later > attach the Jacobian. The p

[Dolfin] NonlinearVariationalProblem interface

2011-07-04 Thread Garth N. Wells
I'm not sold on the NonlinearVariationalProblem interface. I would prefer a constructor takes the Jacobian as an argument. It's much cleaner to do things at construction and removes the need to later attach the Jacobian. Garth ___ Mailing list: https://