Hi Paul
From: "Paul Caton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We are looking at using dom4j in an application that deals with
> arbitrary sections of an XML-encoded document. I just wanted to ask,
> in the API for XPath, does the phrase "XPath expression" cover only
> the functions defined in XML Path Languag
Would people prefer
addAttribute?
+1In the dom4j model, since you can have an
attributeIterator, I see the attributes as "widgets" belonging to the Element,
rather than as properties. The "only one value" constraint could be handled
with an IllegalAddException, or (preferred)
I've just checked into CVS some experimental support for the XML Pull
Parser.
http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/soap/xpp/
I've initially built a PullParserReader in the org.dom4j.io package that
behaves pretty much like the SAXReader but uses the XML Pull Parser rather
than SAX. I was hoping it mig
Good morning James,
At 03:00 19/06/2001 +0100, James Strachan wrote:
Hi
Thomas
From: Thomas
Nichols
This sounds good - though see my comments to James E. re limitations
of parseText().
. BTW, why is it "setAttribute" rather than
"addAttribute" ?
Actually right now its setAttributeValue(name,
