On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:07 +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Clive,
Have checked my version of OOo (on laptop) and it's 3.2 with an Oracle
logo, that's a standard upgrade by Ubuntu.
On the PC it's listed as 3.2.1 Oracle so don't know why the desktop is
a .1 higher than the laptop as
Technology section had some articles on Computing, one on Operating
systems by Hunter Skipworth said that Linux was available, but not good
for the un-techy user. I couldn't find the article online, so can't use
his exact words.
Then along comes their techy page giving assistance (Rick Maybury),
Hi foks,
Thanks for you comments. I think I'll stall for a bit. If I might try to get
an idle PC up together to install lucid to in order to kick it around for a
bit. Though I'm not so concerned about how easily it is set up but more about
how well it keeps going long term.
if only Canonical
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:50 +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Peter,
You could see if the versions of the openoffice.org-common available
and chosen to be installed differ between the two machines.
$ apt-cache policy openoffice.org-common
openoffice.org-common:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:24:15 +0100, t...@ls83.eclipse.co.uk said:
The ability of a user on a client with root access being able to gain
access to other users' files on an NFS server seemed like a fundamental
problem when I was making this same decision. With SMB you have got much
better
Hi Peter,
apt-cache policy openoffice.org3
openoffice.org3:
Installed: 3.2.1-18
Candidate: 3.2.1-18
Version table:
*** 3.2.1-18 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
That package isn't known in any repository, since none are listed with
the version they provide. So you've installed
6 matches
Mail list logo
