On Tuesday 22 Jul 2014 19:04:03 Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> No, you mean like a hot spare for failover when the primary goes kaput,
> or even better, a cluster (of two) fileservers that are in sync and
> share the load, read and write.
This is all still uncertain. It now appears that the current sy
Hi Terry,
> > > Can anyone explain hot backup mode in the context of file server
> > > as opposed to a database? Can it be done?
> >
> > You mean you'd like to snapshot a filesystem so its own internal
> > data is in a consitent state for backing up?
No, you mean like a hot spare for failover wh
On Tuesday 22 Jul 2014 12:25:10 Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > Can anyone explain hot backup mode in the context of file server as
> > opposed to a database? Can it be done?
>
> You mean you'd like to snapshot a filesystem so its own internal data is
> in a consitent state for backing up? Although the
Hi Terry,
> Can anyone explain hot backup mode in the context of file server as
> opposed to a database? Can it be done?
You mean you'd like to snapshot a filesystem so its own internal data is
in a consitent state for backing up? Although the files' data might be
partially complete, e.g. tar cr
Can anyone explain hot backup mode in the context of file server as opposed to a
database? Can it be done?
Terry Coles
--
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2014-08-05 20:00
Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
New thread on mailing list: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug
5 matches
Mail list logo