Hi,
Here you can find a list of problems that were corrected in IE 5.01:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q244655
and here is the description of SP 1:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q261268
As you can see from these kb articles, there were a lot
If IE is such a concern, don't use .NET. What are you really doing with
.NET that you are leveraging? Is it a WinForms app? If so, you might
be just as well to use something different (VB, WTL, etc.). If it is a
WebForms app, you know you only need the change on the server, not the
clients.
A
Hi All,
I need the opinion of you all for one of our project where I have the
requirement of Content management , Document management & Security for a WEB
based application . What architecture would be best suitable for this ( For
E.g - (ASP/VB/SQL server).NET or (ASP/C#/SQL server).NET plus any a
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 08:37
Subject: Re: why IE 5.01
> Reggie Burnett wrote:
>
> > Any idea where I can get a full install of IE 5.01 that I can ship on my
> > products cd? It is possible/likely that some of my client
You should also consider how to use the System.EnterpriseServices.RegistrationHelper
class. This class allows you to easily install any assembly that has
ServicedComponents. It is quite simple to create a VS.NET deployment project that
uses Custom installer actions to install and uninstall web
The exception is only raised if you create the COM component using the
Server.CreateObject(progid) method.
If you create a COM wrapper and new the object directly -- then there is
no way for ASP.Net to intercept the call and fail if aspcompat hasn't
been set.
Hope this helps,
Scott
P.S. A ge
To answer my own question here, for the archives:
Set the aspcompat=true in the @page directive seems to fix the problem.
I'm going to assume that creating the STA component in the ASP.NET MTA
somehow caused it to lose the impersonation token. I'd be interested in
a more detailed explanation as
I hadn't checked but I suspected
> -Original Message-
> From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Dominick Baier
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 5:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [DOTNET] AW: [DOTNET] AW: [DOTNET] Windows authentication and
> Netscape - How
*flush...swirl...gone*
This sender is now on my auto-delete list.
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:42:46 AM, you wrote:
DOR> Brad you are one of... [snip]
DOR> Declan O'Reilly.
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at htt
I've been attempting to write a server-side web control and have run
into a bit of a hurdle. In my web control, I'm overriding the
CreateChildControls method to load a user control, like this:
protected override void CreateChildControls ()
{
EditorControl oEditorControl = (EditorControl)
Page.
Livingston,
COM+ deployment can be an unpleasant experience at times. To understand it fully, I
would recommend MSDN [1]. MSDN provides a number of excellent articles/whitepapers on
various COM+-related "issues". I would also recommend reading the following books:
Transactional COM+
Helo,
I am new to COM + deplotment. Can somebody expalin me how to configure the
Client and Serevr for COM+ applications.
Thanks in advance.
Livingston
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotma
The next meeting will of the Sydney Deep .NET User Group will be held on
Thursday 2 May 2002 between 6.00pm and 8.00pm at:
Level 33, AMP Centre, 50 Bridge St, Sydney.
The topic of this months meeting is 'Building a .NET 'Smart Client'
Application Framework' by Adam Magee.
This session will exam
Hi,
i'm not aware of the changes to IIS 5.1 (shame on me ;-)
but
IIS 5.0 does NOT need to run on a DC either.
bye
dominick baier
ernw
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von
John Lam
Gesendet: Montag, 29. April 2002 00:21
An: [EMAIL PR
This is only true in pre-XP implementations. In Windows XP, Digest
Authentication is implemented as a Security Support Provider (SSP).
Under XP, the IIS 5.1 web server does not need to run on a DC (actually
you can't since that's a server function, and Windows .NET Server isn't
released yet).
-Jo
Hi,
to clear things up -
digest authentication works in the following way -
the browser sends an username and a hashed password to IIS - IIS checks this
username/password against a domain account - to accomplish this IIS needs
access to Active Directory - so IIS has to be member of the correspo
Reggie Burnett wrote:
> Digest auth is a web server function. Why in the world would it require a
> domain controller?
IIRC, I believe that digest authentication is tied to an Active Directory.
The typical way to get secure logins for non-IE is basic auth inside HTTPS.
Brad
--
Read my web log
> It does a challenge/response. However, digest authentication will
> only work
> for IIS installed on a domain controller (of all things ...). Most people
> consider opening up their domain controllers to the internet a bad thing
> (allthough it is getting increasinly trendy to proxy the internal
>
> By my count you have 8 responses helping you to redistribute IE 5.01.
> It's possible that people don't know your other desired answer.
yes, I have several responses concerning distributino of IE but the second
part of my question specifically asked for a technical reason why IE 5.01
sp2 is
Agreed. Any discussions or insinuations concerning disapproval or approval
of general product designs or lack thereof that I wish to post will go to
advocacy. I still stand by the rights of everyone on this list to write
negative comments re: the outcome of specific technical questions so long a
A COM object method I have returns a type "object" according to the C# auto-
fill prompts, but returns a type "Experiment" according to the VB6 auto-
fill prompts. If I declare the variable intended to receive the object as
an "object" type, then there are no errors, but that (Experiment) object'
> Suppose I create a new app domain in my process. What
> triggers it to shut
> down?
When the hosting process terminates or when AppDomain.Unload( yourDomain )
is called.
> Is it when all objects in it are garbage collected?
Nope.
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe fro
<--cut-->
I completely agree that this is a technical forum and, as such, needs to
be focused on answering people problems. Just yesterday I posted a
question asking why IE 5.01 is required for the .Net runtime to install.
No answers. I am working on an application right now that I would love
to
Brad you are one of the saddest fs I have ever come across
Declan O'Reilly.
PS: I suspect that I might be the second saddest f... because I replied to
this thread.
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 9:52
Please take this thread to the advocacy list (there is one)... As the original poster
wrote, "this is a technical forum". Please also post any insinuations or commentary
concerning S$, M$, or [you hope your product goes here]$ to advocacy in future as well.
Thank you.
"We are, after all, profe
I apologize to the other members of the list that have been exposed to this
thread and tell you that I intend this to be my last mailing on this thread.
>
> > There is not a person there to be hurt.
>
> Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any
> humans at all? This
Reggie Burnett wrote:
> There is not a person there to be hurt.
Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any
humans at all? This is real news!
> M$ is not a sign of disrespect, it is a sign of disapproval.
No, disapproval is writing opinion pieces in papers, and havi
I had lot of respect for this list until this little thread. There is a big
difference between personal disrespect like making fun of your or my names
and using the phrase to describe M$. There is not a person there to be
hurt. There is, by their own admission, a company directed by the world's
Hi:
We are having difficulties getting vs.net to do asp.net remote debugging.
We have a winxp client with vs.net installed, a win2k server with iis 5.0,
all windows component updates & vs.net remote debugging. The server has got
two IPs, one is the primary machine IP (say named EARTH) and the sec
hi!
> Michael Weller wrote:
>
> > M$ Dev Environment 2002 v7.0.9466
> > M$ .NET Framework 1.0 v1.0.3705
>
> Can you please show proper respect when posting to a technical forum? This
> sort of behavior is fitting of adolescents, not professionals.
respect??? all right, I'll behave! coming from SU
That sounds promising. I have one question though before I will buy the
book: There are generally two ways to implement the IDocHostUIHandler.
The first option is to attach it to the document via ICustomDoc, the
second is to implement it at the client site for the ActiveX control.
Which one is des
Then still behave respectfull.
I dont call you "Burny" either, do I? With the same reasoning you try to
argu wqith here I would be allowd to make fun out of your name.
If you want to abbreviate, MS is valid. M$ is a sign of disrespect.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft
You can use a DataSet to pass your data around between tiers. You can
use xsd.exe to generate DataSets which expose Product and ProductData's
properties. Also, because you get DataSets back from your queries, ou
don't have to do any of the packaging you are talking about.
I'm sure I've seen using
Hi,
your domain controller has not to be necessarily accessible from the
internet. there has to be a connection somehow between iis and the dc -
thats right.
the rest ist the work of your screening router/firewall.
but i agree - digest authentication does not bring enough benefits for these
con
34 matches
Mail list logo
