Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)

2002-07-02 Thread Brian Graf
Will the list stay alive as long as this tread doesn't die? -Original Message- From: The DOTNET list is retired as of 7/1/02 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Buksbaum, David Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT) yes -Orig

Re: [DOTNET] Administrative Announcement - Please Read

2002-06-03 Thread Brian Graf
I usually refrain from "me too" posts, but in this case I'll make an exception. If it aint broke... -Original Message- From: The DOTNET list will be retired 7/1/02 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of h k ball Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DO

Re: [DOTNET] BUG: Remoting does not distinguish methods differing only by return type

2002-05-18 Thread Brian Graf
> I don't get how this worked even without reflection. In C# (like C++ I > thought) you could not have the return type as the only difference in > the signature. How would the compiler figure out which to call? Yeah, but don't forget that C# isn't the only language that can target the CLR. Thi