Re: [DOTNET] object pooling

2002-06-26 Thread Ron Jacobs
There is much information on this topic at http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/xmlentsvcs/esfaq.aspx#3.1 Plus many other resources at http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/xmlentsvcs/ and http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/rojacobs/default.aspx -Original Message- From: Jeff Mangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [DOTNET] OT: N-Tier Design

2002-05-20 Thread Ron Jacobs
L PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] OT: N-Tier Design --- Ron Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are many benefits that you get in return for a small performance > cost. Do you (or anyone else) have any performance data

Re: [DOTNET] OT: N-Tier Design

2002-05-17 Thread Ron Jacobs
- From: Ron Jacobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] OT: N-Tier Design I don't know why you think that COM+ is too slow. Extensive testing shows that COM+ library applications are just as fast as any other .NET class.

Re: [DOTNET] OT: N-Tier Design

2002-05-17 Thread Ron Jacobs
I don't know why you think that COM+ is too slow. Extensive testing shows that COM+ library applications are just as fast as any other .NET class. Often people think that ServicedComponents must be in server apps which execute out of process and therefore are slower but any code that executes ou

Re: [DOTNET] W2k SP3 - when?

2002-05-02 Thread Ron Jacobs
When it is ready ;-) which looks like later this summer. However, in the meantime you can pick up QFE 18.1 to get the important fixes... -Original Message- From: Thomas Tomiczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 5/2/2002 4:03 AM To: [EMAIL PR

Re: [DOTNET] From C# to VB.NET

2002-05-01 Thread Ron Jacobs
The VB equivalent is a try/finally block using(Foo f = new Foo()) { // ... } // Dispose is called here VB Equivalent Dim f as Foo 'Foo must support IDisposable Try ' ... Finally f.Dispose End Finally Ron Jacobs Program Manager XML Enterpris

Re: [DOTNET] COM + Deployment

2002-04-28 Thread Ron Jacobs
You should also consider how to use the System.EnterpriseServices.RegistrationHelper class. This class allows you to easily install any assembly that has ServicedComponents. It is quite simple to create a VS.NET deployment project that uses Custom installer actions to install and uninstall web

Re: [DOTNET] Serviced Components and New()

2002-04-19 Thread Ron Jacobs
If the transaction is not resolved by SetComplete or SetAbort prior to the transaction timeout (1 minute by default) the transaction will timeout and abort. If the ServicedComponent is disposed prior to the timeout it will also abort. Ron Jacobs Program Manager XML Enterprise Services

Re: [DOTNET] Serviced Components and New()

2002-04-19 Thread Ron Jacobs
See below... Ron Jacobs Program Manager XML Enterprise Services -Original Message- From: Alan Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Serviced Components and New() Firstly thanks to everyone who is

Re: [DOTNET] Remoting Security

2002-04-18 Thread Ron Jacobs
ction context automatically, something that the other protocols will not do. Ron Jacobs Program Manager XML Enterprise Services -Original Message- From: Marina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] Remoting Security Hi,

Re: [DOTNET] SoapVRoot

2002-04-15 Thread Ron Jacobs
will make your ServicedComponent available via .NET remoting both as a well-known (single call) and client activated object over the HttpChannel. Ron Jacobs Program Manager XML Enterprise Services -Original Message- From: Marina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:58