Re: [DOTNET] MSIL API for C#

I know that ILDASM can show me this information but I need library for my > project. > Any ideas? You could try Lutz Roeder's ILReader library [1] [1] http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/download.asp?File=ilreader.zip -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from th

Re: [DOTNET] Fonts

; you mean those with non-proportional spacing...). -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] Operators, CLS compliance, friendly partner methods

They _could_ have used a method forwarding strategy. In fact, that would've been fairly easy to build a compiler that does it automatically. OTOH, I'm personally not very keen on that kind of things... it can be confusing to have the compiler inserting methods with commonly used names. (or

Re: [DOTNET] Operators, CLS compliance, friendly partner methods

an the recommended instance method called Add? Because that's the operator itself. IOW, Managed operators are nothing more than static methods with a known name and marked with the specialname metadata attribute in the signature. -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages fr

Re: [DOTNET] windows minimizing trick to reduce memory utilization..?

the Platform SDK docs (although I don't remember exactly where_). -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] How to create a C# source lib?

use an alternative like NAnt) -- the >longshot. :) I'd argue that even with 3, Option 1 is what should be done, as long as you correctly control the granularity of your assemblies (which shouldn't be hard)./ -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DO

Re: [DOTNET] Toolbar problem: Can't teach an old developer new tricks?

for it, that's how it goes... -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] Toolbar problem: Can't teach an old developer new tricks?

Ovidiu, > reinvent the wheel all over again. Who knows what *common feature* I'll have > to implement next time? Oh, I totally agree. In fact, I remember complaining about this same issue like a year ago ;) -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOT

Re: [DOTNET] Toolbar problem: Can't teach an old developer new tricks?

: Raise events from the toolbar's buttons when they are clicked. I even went one step further and allowed toolbar buttons to be hooked up to corresponding menu items so that you would only need to write a single event handler, much like you do in mfc... -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can

Re: [DOTNET] Timeout on UDP Packet

etOption, like this: s.SetSocketOption ( SocketOptionLevel.Socket, SocketOptionName.ReceiveTimeout, TIMEOUT ); (where TIMEOUT is the timeout in ms you want...) -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can rea

Re: [DOTNET] Schema from Dataset

XML, an element's attribute is itself a node, just as the text inside an element's opening and closing tags are, and neither of them certainly have a />. Processing instructions, like the other two, are just some kinds of nodes, different from elements. (Heck, even comments in XML

Re: [DOTNET] Schema from Dataset

Franklin, > BTW, I knew that the first line was correct as in it is part of a document, but it isn't a > node ... It _is_ a node, just not an element node (it's actually a processing instruction node, but that's another matter ;)) -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You c

Re: [DOTNET] Trace question.

Drew, > I'm sure someone has to have already written one of > these. Well, in that case, I guess SysInternal's excellent DebugView [1] would be more than enough. [1] http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/debugview.shtml -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read m

Re: [DOTNET] VS.NET settings worth keeping?

Hi Chris, > Anything else? Anyone done any of this work yet? I'd add: - All designer settings (XML/HTML/WinForms) - Debugger Settings - Customized TaskList Comment Tokens -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or s

Re: [DOTNET] MC++: string to System::String

rs and libs (much less desirable, imho). -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] MC++: string to System::String

Only if it's larger will an external buffer be allocated on the heap and a pointer to it stored in _Ptr. Regardless of that, you can be sure string::c_str() will return a pointer to the actual storage of the string. -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET a

Re: [DOTNET] MC++: string to System::String

Miguel, > Sorry if you misunderstood me, but i´m not converting a LPCSTR, i´m converting a > std::string, from . Then just do new String(myStdString.c_str()); -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscr

Re: [DOTNET] Named Pipes for Remoting - thanks you (and a question about named pipes)....

ther server)... -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] NIGHTMARE BUG!! Visual Studio fails to build debug, but release works fine..

al with projects of at least medium complexity, it's build system is pretty much useless except for the smallest projects. P.S. If you think you're having problems with 14 projects in a solution, try working on one with 32 [1] And yes, it _does_ happen with separate build directories

Re: [DOTNET] Static libraries and managed C++

uld likely be _not_ putting the managed class into the static library too, just put them completely separate. But now that I think about it, I can't see why the compiler wouldn't be able to do the same on a .LIB, since they are, after all, PE files, too. Never tried it, though... -- To

Re: [DOTNET] gcroot for arguments and locals

class itself could be allocated where the managed runtime has no control, such as in the unmanaged heap. So, extraq support, in the form of GCHandle (or gcroot, which wraps it) is needed to tell the runtime that you still hold a reference to the object. -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can r