Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-29 Thread Reggie Burnett
ly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:57 AM > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect > > > > Neither does the charter require respect for all organizations by all > > people. Respect is not the same as decorum, which

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement

2002-04-29 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Reggie Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement > yes, I have several responses concerning distributino of IE but the second > part of my question specifically asked for a technical reason

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-29 Thread Henk de Koning
, 2002 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect > Neither does the charter require respect for all organizations by all > people. Respect is not the same as decorum, which is required by the list. > > > While many people and institutions often have the right to tell me how to &g

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-29 Thread Brady Kelly
me who I must respect. -Original Message- From: Brad Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 April 2002 16:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect Reggie Burnett wrote: > There is not a person there to be hurt. Really? Microsoft is an advanced artific

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Gregory DiSisto
*flush...swirl...gone* This sender is now on my auto-delete list. Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:42:46 AM, you wrote: DOR> Brad you are one of... [snip] DOR> Declan O'Reilly. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at htt

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
> > By my count you have 8 responses helping you to redistribute IE 5.01. > It's possible that people don't know your other desired answer. yes, I have several responses concerning distributino of IE but the second part of my question specifically asked for a technical reason why IE 5.01 sp2 is

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect (pls move to Advocacy)

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Beauchemin, Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect (pls move to Advocacy) > > > Please take this thread to the advocacy list (there is one)... As > the ori

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement

2002-04-28 Thread Andrew Cherry
<--cut--> I completely agree that this is a technical forum and, as such, needs to be focused on answering people problems. Just yesterday I posted a question asking why IE 5.01 is required for the .Net runtime to install. No answers. I am working on an application right now that I would love to

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Declan O'Reilly
t: Sunday, April 28, 2002 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect > Reggie Burnett wrote: > > > There is not a person there to be hurt. > > Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any > humans at all? This is real news! > > > M$ is not

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect (pls move to Advocacy)

2002-04-28 Thread Beauchemin, Bob
are, after all, professionals". ;-) (Hunter S Thompson) Bob Beauchemin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Reggie Burnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect I apologize to the other members of the

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
I apologize to the other members of the list that have been exposed to this thread and tell you that I intend this to be my last mailing on this thread. > > > There is not a person there to be hurt. > > Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any > humans at all? This

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Brad Wilson
Reggie Burnett wrote: > There is not a person there to be hurt. Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any humans at all? This is real news! > M$ is not a sign of disrespect, it is a sign of disapproval. No, disapproval is writing opinion pieces in papers, and havi

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
ideas, and questions could be exchanged. I guess I was wrong. -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Tomiczek Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 5:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect Then still behave respectfull. I

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Michael Weller
hi! > Michael Weller wrote: > > > M$ Dev Environment 2002 v7.0.9466 > > M$ .NET Framework 1.0 v1.0.3705 > > Can you please show proper respect when posting to a technical forum? This > sort of behavior is fitting of adolescents, not professionals. respect??? all right, I'll behave! coming from SU

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Thomas Tomiczek
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET) -Original Message- From: Reggie Burnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sonntag, 28. April 2002 07:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect What? I didn't catch the origination of this thread but feel compelled to respond. True this

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-27 Thread Reggie Burnett
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] Disrespect Michael Weller wrote: > M$ Dev Environment 2002 v7.0.9466 > M$ .NET Framework 1.0 v1.0.3705 Can you please show proper respect when posting to a technical forum? This sort of behavior is fitting of adolescents, not professionals. Brad --

[DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-27 Thread Brad Wilson
Michael Weller wrote: > M$ Dev Environment 2002 v7.0.9466 > M$ .NET Framework 1.0 v1.0.3705 Can you please show proper respect when posting to a technical forum? This sort of behavior is fitting of adolescents, not professionals. Brad -- Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/ You