ks,
Shawn Wildermuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Peter Stephens
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Transactions and CommandBuilders
>
&g
> Shawn Wildermuth spake:
>
> That may be true, but it doesn't make any sense. We're talking about
> disconnected data. Why would you only want inherit a transaction from
> the select?
But the built in command builder (via the associated data adapter) requires
a select statement to determine
Sunday, April 14, 2002 8:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Transactions and CommandBuilders
>
>
> ,- [ Shawn Wildermuth wrote: ]
> | My use-case is a multi-table DataSet where I am updating
> | the database from the DataSet. Since the tables are
> re
,- [ Shawn Wildermuth wrote: ]
| My use-case is a multi-table DataSet where I am updating
| the database from the DataSet. Since the tables are related, I want a
| single transaction to filter through all the updates, though different
| DataAdapters (using one DataAdapter per table).
`-
e how I am wrong.
Thanks,
Shawn Wildermuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Peter Stephens
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Transactions and C
> Shawn Wildermuth spake:
>
> I just want to confirm this. CommandBuilders and transactions are
> incompatible, right? Since the CommandBuilder generates and destroys
> Command objects on the fly as needed, I assume there is no way to attach
> a transaction to the commands. I want to update a d
I just want to confirm this. CommandBuilders and transactions are
incompatible, right? Since the CommandBuilder generates and destroys
Command objects on the fly as needed, I assume there is no way to attach
a transaction to the commands. I want to update a database with
standard optimistic con
