Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns I
am trying to address where I work.
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second device are
extremely expensive.
I also don't see any distributed file
John H. Bennett III writes:
I am having difficulties trying to get the current stable version of
horde's imp webmail to work correctly using dovecot 1.0rc15. I am
using a pre-release version of SME Server 8 which runs on top of
CentOS 5. I have also tried using the 1.0 release of dovecot
Steffen Kaiser writes:
My statement is simply my point of view, that the API should be independed
of the backend.
LDAP, Postgresql, Mysql.. I think any of them is fine.
I think anything BUT the initial setup that Timo mentioned. Files in
the mailstore I think is the least scalable option.
Justin McAleer writes:
On top of the performance gains, gathering disk usage for billing
changes from parsing hundreds of thousands of maildirsize files (and du
-s or equivalent for those really large maildirs, ugh) to a single sql
query,
Not sure how difficult it would be, but that would be
Francisco Reyes spake the following on 4/28/2007 9:42 AM:
> Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns
> I am trying to address where I work.
>
> Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
>
> NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second devi
Hi,
after the upgrade from 0.99 to 1.0rc15 on our RHEL 5 Server I noticed,
that some of my mailfolders do double the mails subject line in the
listview of thunderbird.
The mail itself isn't doubled and the second mail contains a different
content from a mail that didn't show up in the list.
Hi,
just an idea - maybe you could try to remove the Dovecot index files, so
Dovecot will rebuild them on the next login? Maybe it's some
incompatibility between the versions or some bug from 0.99 index file
creation..
Regards,
Philipp
Götz Reinicke wrote:
Hi,
after the upgrade from 0.99
Hi,
I am playing with Sieve, everything is working nice except notify method.
Source script looks like this (generated with avelsieve):
require
["fileinto","envelope","reject","vacation","imapflags","relational","compara
tor-i;ascii-numeric","notify"];
if
#hashed-avelsieve-source
true
{
keep;
noti
Ok, I will answer to myself :-) Just take a look here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/20813/match=
and thanks for the patch, it works now :-)
Láďa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Láďa
> Sent: Saturday, Apr
finally i was able to determine the root cause of the problem, it was due
to the user corrupted mbox, the solution was to delete the 1st two lines of
the /var/mail/username file, restarted dovecot and whoala, i can now telnet
successfully.
This is a well-known bug in the 0.99 series...
It is s
Ok. I started with the example file and edited it as the Quick Start
suggested and here is the final working result:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dovecot -n
Password:
# /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
protocols: imap
disable_plaintext_auth: no
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/l
On 4/28/07, Wade Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. I started with the example file and edited it as the Quick Start
suggested and here is the final working result:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dovecot -n
Password:
# /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
protocols: imap
disa
Wade Smart wrote:
I was able to login in via telnet like the tutorial said.
In my Maildir/new I had 884 new messages.
The tutorial said to access the Inbox, and I did and could.
However, then my 884 messages were gone!!!
I do not understand what the heck happened.
Did I just loose all my messages
13 matches
Mail list logo
