Re: [Dovecot] [Debian] Packages available for 1.0.0

Brian T Glenn wrote: They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from backports.org and is built for sarge. deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Hi, I would like to have the same for Etch. Co

[Dovecot] Latest MANAGESIEVE patch -- how to start daemon?

Hello list, I'm using Dovecot 1.0.0 on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE and applied the latest MANAGESIEVE patch v3 [1] which seems to have worked smoothly, i.e. all hunks succeeded and no compilation problems. Now this may be stupid question with an obvious answer, but I am at a loss at how to start the

Re: [Dovecot] Replication plans

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:29PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 09:58 -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > Best case, when all the nodes, and the network is up, locking latency > > shouldn't be much longer than say twice the RTT. But what really > > matters, and causes all the

[Dovecot] [Debian] Packages available for 1.0.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from backports.org and is built for sarge. deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Enjoy, - -- http://www.d

Re: [Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

I have a real need to have (at least) one shared folder (inbound faxes) with shared \Seen flags - so the 5 people assigned to monitor it will know when someone else has seen/forwarded a new fax - and private \Seen flags on other shared maildirs (like distribution lists, etc)... Are you saying

Re: [Dovecot] multiple dovecot invocations

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 14:57 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote: > How do I correctly run multiple dc instances? Change the base_dir. Although if you're also using SSL, there's still a bug: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/f7c1b6f2947d signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Re: [Dovecot] UW-IMAP style mbox snarfing from /var/mail/ to ~/mbox

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 21:12 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > In your original posting you said: > > if all the > > messages couldn't be copied, for example because of out of quota, then > > none of the messages are copied. I suppose that could be a problem. It > > might be possible to fix that by changi

Re: [Dovecot] UW-IMAP style mbox snarfing from /var/mail/ to ~/mbox

Timo Sirainen wrote: Jun 4 15:28:27 bach dovecot: IMAP(kuhls): Timeout leak: 0x808ad10 Fixed and uploaded new version. Hi, thanks, the log message disappeared. In your original posting you said: if all the messages couldn't be copied, for example because of out of quota, then none of the

[Dovecot] multiple dovecot invocations

I need to have multiple invocations of dovecot running, one for productions and then one or more for test/dev, doing things like trying different authentication methods, getting quota working, etc. I knew how to do this with inetd, but I have been convinced that direct invocation is preferable

Re: [Dovecot] Replication plans

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 09:58 -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > Best case, when all the nodes, and the network is up, locking latency > shouldn't be much longer than say twice the RTT. But what really > matters, and causes all the nasty bugs that even single-master > replication systems have to deal w

Re: [Dovecot] AIX mail quota plugin problems + dotlock problem resolved

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 14:29 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote: > 1) The AIX quotactl subroutine is defined here(put it in the search box) > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp > Partial cut and paste of it: .. > Did the trace hold any more information? It only confirms that

Re: [Dovecot] AIX mail quota plugin problems + dotlock problem resolved

1) The AIX quotactl subroutine is defined here(put it in the search box) http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp Partial cut and paste of it: *#include * *int quotactl (*/Path/*,*/ Cmd/*,*/ ID/*,*/ Addr/*)* *int* /Cmd/

Re: [Dovecot] errors in dovecot-uidlist

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:47 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote: > As you can see, the unix timestamps are descending between uid 35 > and uid 36 .. and this causes problems if we intend to make webmail > access the messages through imap. (it expects to receive the > messages sorted by when they were receiv

Re: [Dovecot] Public Namespace and ACLs with pure virtual users

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 13:53 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 6/3/2007 Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > ACL plugin shouldn't have anything to do with that decision. The > > \Seen flag is stored privately if you have created dovecot-shared > > file to the maildir. There isn't yet support

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP traffic logging

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 13:48 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > >>> I wonder if it is possible to log the number of bytes send in response > >>> to IMAP commands. Unfortunately there seems to be no config option > >>> similar to "pop3_logout_format". > > >> There's a patch for it. Someone already gave

Re: [Dovecot] UW-IMAP style mbox snarfing from /var/mail/ to ~/mbox

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 15:37 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > Is it possible to snarf more than one mbox from /var/mail to > /home/$user, like this? Shouldn't be too difficult to modify the plugin. > Jun 4 15:28:27 bach dovecot: IMAP(kuhls): Timeout leak: 0x808ad10 Fixed and uploaded new version.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Authentication Problem - Help pls!

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 16:27 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: > -bash-2.05b$ sudo su > Password: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ax | grep dove > 43802 ?? Ss 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/dovecot > 43803 ?? S 0:00.05 dovecot-auth > [EMAIL PROTECTED] attach 43803 > GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) > Copyright 1998

Re: [Dovecot] AIX mail quota plugin problems + dotlock problem resolved

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 12:30 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote: > quotactl(Q_GETQUOTA, /) failed: Invalid argument So apparently this quotactl() call is wrong with AIX: if (quotactl(root->mount->mount_path, QCMD(Q_GETQUOTA, USRQUOTA), root->uid, (void *)&dqblk) < 0) { I don't

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Authentication Problem - Help pls! - RESOLVED

On Tuesday June 05, 2007 at 10:51:04 (AM) Dominic Marks wrote: > Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: > > * On 04/06/07 16:27 +0300, Wash wrote: > > | * On 04/06/07 15:16 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > | | On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:02 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: > > | | > I have built and manually cop

Re: [Dovecot] AIX mail quota plugin problems + dotlock problem resolved

Duh. Egg all over my face, for missing such a simple thing as a misspelled word. OK. Incidentally, I have found and resolved the dotlock problem. Nothing to do with NFS, rather there was some legacy (something my predecessor had set up 10 years ago or more) instructions in the .procmailrc f

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Authentication Problem - Help pls! - RESOLVED

* On 05/06/07 15:51 +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: | Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: | > * On 04/06/07 16:27 +0300, Wash wrote: | > | * On 04/06/07 15:16 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: | > | | On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:02 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: | > | | > I have built and manually copied dovecot-auth

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Authentication Problem - Help pls! - RESOLVED

Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: > * On 04/06/07 16:27 +0300, Wash wrote: > | * On 04/06/07 15:16 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > | | On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:02 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: > | | > I have built and manually copied dovecot-auth to the install > destination > | | > and now it id not st

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Authentication Problem - Help pls! - RESOLVED

* On 04/06/07 16:27 +0300, Wash wrote: | * On 04/06/07 15:16 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: | | On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:02 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote: | | > I have built and manually copied dovecot-auth to the install destination | | > and now it id not stripped. Now this is the result of the d