Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Erland Nylend
On 2007-06-17, 17:52, Erland Nylend wrote: > On 2007-06-17, 12:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 01:23 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote: > > > On 2007-06-16, 01:36, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > > OK, attached is the next one. I actually found one missing error handler > > > > from there. D

[Dovecot] ?? Error: child 1064 (imap) killed with signal 4

2007-06-17 Thread Benton Haynes
After noticing a commit to the HG repository, http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/f88b1e225be5 about, " We didn't update last_output timestamp with long fetches, causing Dovecot to idle-disconnect the client." I chekced out the latest from the DOVECOT-1.0 repo, and built again. Unfo

Re: [Dovecot] v1.0.1 released

2007-06-17 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:55:32PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz.sig > > Lots of small fixes. Packages for RHEL3,4,5 and FC5,6 and F7 are updated to 1.0.1: http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ >

Re: [Dovecot] index

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
(Ccing again the list in case someone else has similar problems) On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 20:14 +0200, Lucas -LandM- wrote: > Hi Timo, > >I patched the source and same result. We think the problem is because > everytime user access to his mailbox, dovecot do the index again. And it > consume n

Re: [Dovecot] Binary packagers: BSD license issues

2007-06-17 Thread Greg Troxel
Adding this SHA256 code made me read the BSD license once again. It says: * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distrib

Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Erland Nylend
On 2007-06-17, 13:21, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 13:19 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > The uidlist is locked while maildir is being synchronized. With local > > filesystems syncing a 22k maildir takes less than a second. I don't know > > with GPFS. You could try this with for exam

Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Erland Nylend
On 2007-06-17, 13:19, Timo Sirainen wrote: > But it doesn't happen always I guess? No. The accounts receive most of the deliveries just fine. Then inbetween the successful deliveries, some fail with that error message. > Maybe this has something to do with GPFS? Could be. I'm not sure. > That e

Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Erland Nylend
On 2007-06-17, 12:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 01:23 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote: > > On 2007-06-16, 01:36, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > OK, attached is the next one. I actually found one missing error handler > > > from there. Doesn't matter if you keep the previous patch or not.

Re: [Dovecot] subdir disappeared

2007-06-17 Thread Luigi Rosa
Timo Sirainen said the following on 17/6/2007 12:06: These pretty clearly say that the new/ directory doesn't exist. I've no idea why, but since that's the INBOX I can't think of a way Dovecot could cause this. Neither I. I reported this issue because is VERY VERY strange. The Linux installati

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA munging INBOX access times?

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:07 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote: > > Hmm. I wonder how much of a timing window is left; this could be a viable > > option for us. However, I would like to consider our future options for > > mailbox formats other than mbox (we will eventually migrate I'm sure). > > For

Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 13:19 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > The uidlist is locked while maildir is being synchronized. With local > filesystems syncing a 22k maildir takes less than a second. I don't know > with GPFS. You could try this with for example expunging a message and > seeing how long it ta

Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 22:20 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote: > Jun 15 09:24:13 smtp1 deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > mailbox_transaction_commit() failed > Jun 15 09:24:13 smtp1 deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > save failed to INBOX: Timeout while waiting for lock > Jun 15 09:24:1

Re: [Dovecot] 60 seconds problem

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 07:17 +0400, Waheed Rahuman wrote: > I am using Dovecot-1.0-0_27.rc10.e14. > > And when try to login with outlook there is an error > > saying "You server did not respond do u want to try again in 60 seconds" > > Any solutions please help http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestInsta

Re: [Dovecot] subdir disappeared

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:02 +0200, Luigi Rosa wrote: > I have an installation that sometimes acts strangely: > > Jun 12 11:28:00 mail dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, > method=PLAIN, rip=10.10.10.103, lip=10.10.10.254 > Jun 12 11:53:59 mail dovecot: IMAP(nadia): > inotify_add_watch(/var/spool/

Re: [Dovecot] save failed to INBOX

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 01:23 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote: > On 2007-06-16, 01:36, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > OK, attached is the next one. I actually found one missing error handler > > from there. Doesn't matter if you keep the previous patch or not. > > Here's the first one: > > Jun 17 00:34:50 smt

Re: [Dovecot] Per user based protocol access and pause after failed login?

2007-06-17 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 01:16 +0300, Mart Pirita wrote: > passdb pam { > args = %s%c > } .. > But now even pop user can't login:(. Oh, sorry. I forgot the %s%c doesn't work yet in 1.0. So, the next possibility would be: passdb passwd-file { args = /etc/dovecot/deny.%Ls.%c deny = yes } And c

Re: [Dovecot] using 'socat' to relay Dovecot SASL's auth socket over TCP?

2007-06-17 Thread Roger Binns
snowcrash wrote: > which, iiuc (?), can bidirectionally bridge the Dovecot unix-socket to > a TCP socket that Exim can talk/listen to. I've used socat extensively on a completely unrelated project in order to bridge UNIX domain sockets across machines. I assume you currently have this: exim ->