-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
As a long-time Debian user, I'd really rather not patch anything. :)
Um, I couldn't stand this policy while waiting for Sarge.
But yes, if dovecot's LDA would honour something like .forward
files, I'd b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
>
> Dovecot-LDA is using _one_ script, when there is an user Sieve script,
> the global one is _not_ used.
>
Okay now it works.
But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
rule. Otherwise his spam
Hi Timo,
We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
process to hang.
Here's how it looks like if we issued a FETCH 40 FULL:
* 40 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "09-Aug-2007 11:50:44 +0800"
RFC822.SIZE 803392
ENVELOPE ("Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:09:09 +0800 (CST)"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam folder. I'm not
really sure, if this is the solution i'd like to have.
Ye
Timo,
is this ok with you? It allows building dovecot-sieve against an installed
dovecot package (if --enable-header-install additionally installs liblib.a)
including sievec and sieved (needed for pysieved).
Geert
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:11:38AM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Wed
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 21:19 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > dovecot: Aug 08 18:50:11 Error: IMAP(anne): Ambiguous mail location
> > > > setting, don't know w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Ganschow schrieb:
> Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
>> Dovecot-LDA is using _one_ script, when there is an user Sieve script,
>> the global one is _not_ used.
>
>
> Okay now it works.
>
> But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to cre
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz.sig
Hopefully the next release can be v1.1.beta1. I'm not aware of any major
problems and I think I'm pretty much done with new features (except fo
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 21:19 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > > dovecot: Aug 08 18:50:11 Error: IMAP(anne): Ambigu
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> userdb /etc/passwd {
> }
userdb passwd {
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 10:01 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
>
> > But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
> > rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam fo
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:32 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
> I am moving from and old FC2 system to a new RHEL5 system and am having
> trouble getting the UIDLs to move over right, mainly the UID.
>
> I copy over the mailbox, and see the x-uid in the message is what it was
> on the old server, but
Le 07.08.2007 18:05, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
> 0. Apply the patches.
> 1. cd to the top level of the distribution directory tree (above "src")
> 2. Run: autoconf
> 3. Run: autoheader
> 4. Run: automake
> 5. Run: configure
> 6. Compile
Thanks, this seems to work at last !
But unfortunately
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
> We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
> process to hang.
..
> sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF2C0, 1, 0xFFBFF2B4)Err#11 EAGAIN
> fstat64(10, 0x000CB208) = 0
> sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF4A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> The new Sieve supports include feature, so it should be somewhat easy to
> support automatic includes. I think.
Will this support be included in dovecot 1.1?
Sebastian
- --
Sebastian Ganschow
Königsberger Str. 17
45770 Mar
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:03 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
> > We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
> > process to hang.
> ..
> > sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF2C0, 1, 0xFFBFF2B4)Err#11 EAGAIN
> > fstat64(10, 0
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:00 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Le 07.08.2007 18:05, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
>
> > 0. Apply the patches.
> > 1. cd to the top level of the distribution directory tree (above "src")
> > 2. Run: autoconf
> > 3. Run: autoheader
> > 4. Run: automake
> > 5. Run: conf
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 10:33 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> Timo,
>
> is this ok with you? It allows building dovecot-sieve against an installed
> dovecot package (if --enable-header-install additionally installs liblib.a)
> including sievec and sieved (needed for pysieved).
I don't really like
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:06 +0200, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> > The new Sieve supports include feature, so it should be somewhat easy to
> > support automatic includes. I think.
>
> Will this support be included in dovecot 1.1?
Includes are already in dovecot-sieve v1.1
Hi,
El Miércoles, 8 de Agosto de 2007 17:42, martin f krafft escribió:
> > Of course, you could patch Dovecot LDA. It is rather straight
> > forward.
>
> As a long-time Debian user, I'd really rather not patch anything. :)
As long as nothing depends on whatever you patch, you can do it with no
p
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:49:32PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I don't really like that idea. The next thing another package wants
> some other Dovecot libraries and soon we'll have all the .a libs
> installed somewhere.
liblib.a would be installed with --enable-header-install only, so for
users
also sprach Joseba Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.09.1251 +0200]:
> As long as nothing depends on whatever you patch, you can do it
> with no problem. And I don't think that anything depends on
> dovecot.
You just won't get security updates anymore.
--
martin; (greetings from th
also sprach Steffen Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.09.0902 +0200]:
> Sendmail uses different mailers (exim calls them transports, if
> I remember correctly) for the two different maildrops, "scripts"
> are invoked by the virtual "*prog*" mailer, whereas the spooling
> into a local mailbox is p
Le jeudi 09 août 2007 09:47, Sebastian Ganschow a écrit :
> But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
> rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam folder. I'm not
> really sure, if this is the solution i'd like to have.
Why not include a default sieve scr
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 13:09 -0600, Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
> Sorry about the no 'bt full'.
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x107712a8 in gss_delete_sec_context () from /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.8
I guess this fixes it:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/d2da308f
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:47 +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using SMTP auth with Exim authenticating against Dovecot's auth
> socket. My (excellent) SMTP test tool "swaks"
> (http://jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks) tries multiple auth mechanismus
> consecutively which leads to the following me
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:50 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:05 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
> >> Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT-
> >> ileneyoung,:::10.200.254.110): lookup
> >> Aug 1 11:58:
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 21:37 +0200, Thomas Zajic wrote:
> I've been seeing this for quite a while now, but only today finally got
> off my lazy you-know-what and did a backtrace. Here's the requested info
> as per http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html:
..
> #1 0x08056954 in auth_worker_handle_passl (cl
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:12 -0400, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> I'm trying to set up two shared folder hierarchies on my Dovecot
> installation for two groups of employees, all of whom should only have
> access to their own hierarchy. Any employee should be able to create
> sub-folders and gener
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 22:47 +0100, pod wrote:
> I'd like to put forward the following patch for dovecot-sieve.
Thanks, committed.
>and "Resent-BCC" fields. Note that the appended patch also includes a
>fix for some missing parentheses in the "resent-to" test which resulted
>in some e
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:23:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > The fix has been sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've tried to send some of my own changes and minor fixes a few times
> already but no-one's ever answered. Maybe I should try once more.
The cyrus-bugs is (or at least seems t
Le 09.08.2007 12:45, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
>> Aug 7 19:34:36 rouge dovecot: IMAP(stransky): quota-fs: remote rquota
>> call failed: RPC: Authentication error
>
> Did you include http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/0f6d4f8dd587
You are right, this was not included, thanks ! Now I have included t
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:28 +0200, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:23:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > The fix has been sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I've tried to send some of my own changes and minor fixes a few times
> > already but no-one's ever answered
I tried to disable courier-pop3 today in favour of dovecot pop3.
Prior to that I ran:
find /home -maxdepth 1 -type d | xargs --replace
/usr/local/scripts/courier-dovecot-migrate.pl --overwrite --recursive --convert
{}
( /home is hashed two levels deep: /home/a/a/aanton/Maildir/ )
After that,
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 17:36 -0400, Jerry Yeager wrote:
> dovecot: imap-login: Maximum number of connections exceeded:
> user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.1.1, lip=192.168.1.50, TLS
mail_max_userip_connections limit causes this. I guess I'll have to
change the error message, because even I thought
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I tried to disable courier-pop3 today in favour of dovecot pop3.
> Prior to that I ran:
>
> find /home -maxdepth 1 -type d | xargs --replace
> /usr/local/scripts/courier-dovecot-migrate.pl --overwrite --recursive
> --convert {}
>
> (
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you had run Dovecot as IMAP server, then it wasn't such a great idea
> to run the migration, because it recreates dovecot-uidlist files trying
> to make them compatible with Courier's POP3 uidlist file.
Oops.
> Creating dovecot-uidlist then caused the U
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:35 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Creating dovecot-uidlist then caused the UIDVALIDITY to change, which
> > causes IMAP clients to redownload all messages, and as you can see
> > Dovecot doesn't handle UIDVALIDITY changes all that nicely. v1.1 does a
> > better job with
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, what you just did probably did that. It just caused IMAP users to
> download the mails again, but that's more transparent to users because
> it doesn't create duplicates.
OK
> I did think about adding the possibility of storing POP3 UIDLs to a
> sepa
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 08:43 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
> Why, yes, it does. Do I need to swap them ore delete X-IMAPbase,
Swapping probably helps.
> and is there a utility to do that, or do I have to make one?
I'm not aware of such an utility.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
Hi there,
I got dovecot compiled and running on HP-UX 11.23.
It's using LDAPUX and PAM for authentication. So far, it works. But after
logging in the connection is closed immediately. It looks like this:
telnet 143
Connected to ...
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Dovecot ready.
a01 login
Conne
Why, yes, it does. Do I need to swap them ore delete X-IMAPbase, and is
there a utility to do that, or do I have to make one?
Dan
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:32 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
> > I am moving from and old FC2 system to a new
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:07 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Is it OK to move mailboxes around from under Dovecot?
Yes.
> - Is there a way to tell an external application when mail has been
>moved by a client?
Not really. There is a plugin for dspam, but there is no generic plugin.
>
I did that and it was not able to fix things.
Additionally in my logs I get the following messages:
Dovecot v1.0.rc15 starting up
pop3-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
rip=:::128.174.124.57, lip=:::128.174.124.57, secured
POP3(danield): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of
mailbox
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:03 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
process to hang.
..
sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF2C0, 1, 0xFFBFF2B4)
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 11:23 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> [Quick side-question: should I be using $USER or $RESTRICTED_USER
> here? I can't work out what the difference between them is. Both
> are set within Dovecot's standard environment.]
If you're using system users they're the same. If
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:00 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
> I did that and it was not able to fix things.
>
> Additionally in my logs I get the following messages:
>
> Dovecot v1.0.rc15 starting up
>
> pop3-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
> rip=:::128.174.124.57, lip=:::128.174.124.57
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
> Error: imap-login: fd_send(7) failed: Bad file number
> Error: child 22629 (login) returned error 89
>
>
> As far as I can see, the problem seems to reside in dovecot's fdpass.c...
Dovecot's fd_send() probably doesn't work right with HP-
I blasted /home/username/mail/.imap recopied the mailbox, swapped the
UID and the IMAP lines and it worked.
thanks for the help,
Dan
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:19 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:00 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
> > I did that and it was not able to fix thi
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
>> Error: imap-login: fd_send(7) failed: Bad file number
>> Error: child 22629 (login) returned error 89
>>
>>
>> As far as I can see, the problem seems to reside in dovecot's
>> fdpass.c...
>
> Dovecot's fd_send() probably doesn't work ri
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:04 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
> >> Error: imap-login: fd_send(7) failed: Bad file number
> >> Error: child 22629 (login) returned error 89
> >>
> >>
> >> As far as I can see, the problem seems to reside in dovec
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:42 +0200, Thibault VINCENT wrote:
> The very precise question is : How can I tell dovecot to compute the « home »
> path from the login name when using LDAP userdb ?
This is possible with Dovecot v1.1, but not with v1.0. There you can
use:
user_attrs = ..., =home=/var/sp
Did a quick-n-dirty install of 1.1.alpha2 on a Fedora Core 6 server... am
getting the following message in the maillog, though there seems to be no
problem accessing mail. Error seems to be consistent for all users.
Running 1.0.3 on the system previously.
Aug 8 22:49:26 stage2 dovecot: IMAP(test
Hello, under what situation the error:
dovecot-uidlist.lock was deleted (kept it 0 seconds )
will happen? I saw quite some of these in dovecot log.
Thanks,
- Joe
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.09.1319 +0200]:
> So yes, if I find a suitable virtual delivery agent or a way to pass
> the maildir location from postfix to e.g. procmail, I'll have it
> solved. But right now it does not look like it's possible.
I can report success. This
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:44 -0600, Mike Cisar wrote:
> Did a quick-n-dirty install of 1.1.alpha2 on a Fedora Core 6 server... am
> getting the following message in the maillog, though there seems to be no
> problem accessing mail. Error seems to be consistent for all users.
> Running 1.0.3 on the
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 23:49 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hello, under what situation the error:
>
> dovecot-uidlist.lock was deleted (kept it 0 seconds )
>
> will happen? I saw quite some of these in dovecot log.
Do you use NFS? If so, are all clocks synchronized? What Dovecot
version?
signature.
Hi Timo,
Yes, it is on NFS. Version is 1.0.2. Does the time matter?
- Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dotlock file was delete
> Yes, it is on NFS. Version is 1.0.2. Does the time matter?
You're serious??
Time is *always* important on a mail server - and even more so when NFS
is involved...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Oh Yes.. I mean the time sync between the file server and the dovecot
server. :-) what if there is a few seconds differences between the two?
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:40 AM
Subject: Re:
> > default_mail_env =
> > mbox:/vhome/%l/home/%n/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/vmail/%l/%n
>
> This reminds me that I'll remove default_mail_env from v1.1. It was
> renamed to mail_location long time ago.
>
> Looks like this was a bug. Thanks, fixed:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/c6b1d8515354
Tha
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:54 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> mail_location =
> mbox:~/.imap_mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=/var/mail/indexes/%u
>
> mbox_snarf = ~/.imap_mail/inbox
>
> - The index for $HOME/.imap_mail/inbox is created in
>$HOME/.imap_mail/.imap/inbox/, while the indexes for other m
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 00:39 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> Oh Yes.. I mean the time sync between the file server and the dovecot
> server. :-) what if there is a few seconds differences between the two?
Keep it less than a second or you'll have problems.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:01 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
Sorry, looks like it took a while to reply.
> I've noticed that when slapd which I'm using as the passdb and the prefetched
> userdb is restarted I have to restart dovecot. As a matter of fact, if I
> don't,
> I get the following error :
>
Joe Wong spake the following on 8/9/2007 9:39 AM:
> Oh Yes.. I mean the time sync between the file server and the dovecot
> server. :-) what if there is a few seconds differences between the two?
>
Fix it! Run ntp or an equivalent on all servers that use NFS or handle mail.
It is that important to
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 11:40 +0100, Andy Shellam wrote:
> The problem, however, is Dovecot isn't seeming to understand this, and
> is endlessly looping, trying to query it every 5 seconds. My client
> (telnet during testing) is simply sitting there waiting for a response,
> which it's never goin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:37:16PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:07 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > - Is it OK to move mailboxes around from under Dovecot?
>
> Yes.
Cool. I'm impressed by Dovecot, really :-)
> > - Is t
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:29 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> /* setup environment - set the most important environment first
> (paranoia about filling up environment without noticing) */
> restrict_access_set_env(system_user, uid, gid, chroot_dir,
>
On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:50 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:05 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT-
ileneyoung,:::10.2
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 11:01 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
> > No, that setting doesn't do anything for IMAP. Also none of those
> > settings affect the "unknown user" error, so maybe 0.99 is somehow
> > lucky
> > in not generating those. Perhaps setting blocking=yes to userdb passwd
> > args would he
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:07 +0200, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
> > > IMAP(doudou): file ostream-crlf.c: line 339 (_send_istream): assertion
> > > failed: ((size_t)ret <= iov.iov_len)
> > Hmm. Can you get Dovecot to dump a core file?
> > Probably easiest way to get this fixed would be then if you sent me
Hi,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:54 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
- The index for $HOME/.imap_mail/inbox is created in
$HOME/.imap_mail/.imap/inbox/, while the indexes for other mbox files
are created in /var/mail/indexes/%u, like its supposed to be. How to
disable creatin
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 20:43 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> Big thanks! Your patch fixed the bug, now I can throw away my ugly
> work-arounds for this. Weird enough I did not activate mbox_lazy_writes.
It's the default when imap/pop3 is started by Dovecot master, but I was
testing it by running imap d
I'm seeing a crash in 1.1alpha2 when trying to expunge a folder when
"lazy_expunge" is enabled:
namespace private {
separator = .
prefix = .EXPUNGED/
location = maildir:/mailstore/%u/Expunged
hidden = yes
}
...
lazy_expunge = .EXPUNGED/ .EXPUNGED/ .EXPUNGED/
Commenting out "lazy_expunge
Bernd Kuhls wrote:
Now I create a new message in Thunderbird and save it as draft. A zero
byte file "Drafts" is created in /home/$user/.imap_mail/ but the message
I wanted to save got _lost_, /home/$user/.imap_mail/Drafts stays at zero
bytes. The next message I try to save as draft finds its way
On Aug 9, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 17:36 -0400, Jerry Yeager wrote:
dovecot: imap-login: Maximum number of connections exceeded:
user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.1.1, lip=192.168.1.50, TLS
mail_max_userip_connections limit causes this. I guess I'll have to
* Timo Sirainen, 2007-08-09 14:05
> Thanks, this should fix it:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/870e4d1cf2b3
Yup, seems like it did - no more crashes so far. Thanks! :-)
--
=-=
- Thomas "ZlatkO" Zajic <[EMAIL PROTEC
77 matches
Mail list logo
