Hello,
This is new yum installation .I guess to have it upgraded I would have to do it
from sources.
Slawomir
_
Be your own boss today! Go to Technical School. Click here.
http://3rdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/Ioyw6ijngzUEYVPPo5gA
On 05:51:38 2007-10-02 Andreas Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > I just implemented a new feature with which you can easily implement
> > pristine training or such:
> >
> > http://git.sipsolutions.net/?p=dovecot-antispam.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ee8b72dab4a5bc0309a956942e
Hi,
> PACKAGE_VERSION is only defined if you're building in the dovecot source tree.
> It is set in the config.h file.
Hmm. That's too bad, it'd be nice to have the dovecot version built into
the plugin.
> If you're building against libdspam you can't define -DHAVE_CONFIG_H or dspam
> will look
I get this assertion failure:
file maildir-save.c: line 456 (maildir_save_finish): assertion failed:
(ctx->seq != 0)
once a while when I APPEND messages to a folder. My plugin doesn't touch
the ctx, especially not the internal maildir one, but I have no idea
where to start looking. Any hints?
jo
Hi to all,
very strange! I tried to debug why imap process takes 100% CPu and it is
very slow when I move an email from an imap folder to another imap folder
and then I typed:
strace -tt -o /log-imap.txt -p
well, during the trace the imap process doesn't crash and it is very fast.
If I sto
I am trying to get a SPEC file for an RPM to build a devel package. I
have it working, except for one thing. 1.0.5 doesn't actually install
the headers with that option to configure found in the subject.
It does create the directory, but it doesn't put the files there.
Timo, is this a known/unkno
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:45 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I get this assertion failure:
>
> file maildir-save.c: line 456 (maildir_save_finish): assertion failed:
> (ctx->seq != 0)
>
> once a while when I APPEND messages to a folder. My plugin doesn't touch
> the ctx, especially not the internal
Hi
Thanks, I guess I can handle the BAD response in my application via
javamail by just catching the exception. I think in dovecot it sends back
the "BAD", but also closes the connection ? Is that the expected behavior
on a BAD fetch, to close the IMAP connection?
Exchange also sends back a NO
One of our users seems to have strange problems with his mailbox:
Oct 2 00:36:42 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rb): Corrupted transaction log file
/home/r/b/rb/Maildir/.listen.CCL/dovecot.index.log: Append with UID 1096,
but next_uid = 1097
Oct 2 00:36:42 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rb): Corrupt
On Tue 02 Oct 2007, Charles Marcus wrote:
> you're teasing us? You missed the request for dovecot -n output?
> pertinent log snippets?
>
> Seriously - how is anyone supposed to help you? Guess?
Sorry, the output of "dovecot -n" is
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tuesday, September 25 at 06:26 PM, quoth Timo Sirainen:
That's not *quite* what I meant. ARRIVAL is "when did this mail get
here", while DATE is supposed to be "when was this mail sent". My
thought here is that "when was this mail sent" can be approximated
in the absence of a Date header by
Hello,
We are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
with OCFS2 for our mail servers. There are three nodes in the cluster
with shared storage and OCFS2 filesystem on it. The filesystem
is used for mail storage(using Maildir layout) and is accessed by smtpd,
pop3 and im
On Tuesday, October 2 at 09:49 AM, quoth Kyle Wheeler:
Aha! That's perfect! (and so simple!)
If anyone in the future is interested in the code for this, here's what I
did that works for me. This goes in all three places that mail_get_date() is
used in the code:
I put up a patch for this (an
Trever L. Adams wrote:
> I am trying to get a SPEC file for an RPM to build a devel package. I
> have it working, except for one thing. 1.0.5 doesn't actually install
> the headers with that option to configure found in the subject.
See Axel's SPEC file, he installs by hand:
http://dl.atrpms.n
Ed W wrote:
- Generate an initial SHA256 hash out of the password+salt.
- Re-hash the initial SHA256 hash many thousands of times.
As an aside you should do some research to determine if the second of
these steps adds any value. I don't believe that there is a known way
to reverse an SHA25
Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
>> If you're building against libdspam you can't define -DHAVE_CONFIG_H or dspam
>> will look for its own dpsam config.h.
>
> Hah. Hmm we can do some makefile tricks to only define that for
> antispam-plugin.c rather than the backends.
This would be a workaround
On 2007-10-02 09:06:47 -0700, Troy Engel wrote:
> Trever L. Adams wrote:
> > I am trying to get a SPEC file for an RPM to build a devel package. I
> > have it working, except for one thing. 1.0.5 doesn't actually install
> > the headers with that option to configure found in the subject.
>
> See A
Hi,
> This would be a workaround but not really nice. What about reading the output
> of dovecot --version and adding it.
Hmm. No, we need the version we're building against not the running
version.
> I've updated the plugin it should work now. The problem is that it always
> fails for me. It ma
Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> Weird. I'll take a look. crm114-exec definitely works, might be worth
> comparing. I'm out starting immediately until tomorrow night, will take
> a look then.
dspam-exec doesn't work too.
>
> johannes
-- andreas
--
http://www.cynapses.org/ - cybernetic synaps
On startup of dovecot 1.1b2 I seem to have some permission trouble.
Dovecot was configured with --prefix=/usr/local/dovecot-1.1 for testing
purposes while dovecot 1.0.2 is in production.
# cd /usr/local/dovecot-1.1/sbin/
# ./dovecot -F -c ../etc/dovecot.conf
Enet_connect_unix(/usr/local/dovecot-
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be mistaken.
My Thunderbir
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be m
> Jeff Grossman wrote:
>> I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
>> with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with
>> a
>> vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
>> dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, b
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I looked through all of the 1.1 announcements and did not see it. I also
looked at the wiki page talking about the 1.0 to 1.1 upgrade, nothing
there.
I think the windows mobile device is looking for an INBOX. prefix where my
other setup (Thunderbird, Outlook, and Squirrelma
I'm doing in-site migration of accounts from /etc/passwd to an LDAP
directory. The migration should be progressive (not all users at the
same time).
I'm already able to check mail for accounts in /etc/passwd and accounts
in LDAP.
The problem is with mail delivery. I'm using Postfix + Dovecot-LDA
Jon Blazquez wrote:
The system works fine but when there are mailing lists the load
increases dramatically.
Any suggestions?
First thing that I would do is to reduce number of concurrent deliver
processes. I have no clue how this is done with Sendmail but with
Postfix one could adjust deli
26 matches
Mail list logo
